Cited by 791Fish Ecology and Management StudiesHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology

Linkages between flow regime, biota, and ecosystem processes: implications for river restoration

Palmer, Margaret, Ruhi, Albert·2019·Science

Abstract

River ecosystems are highly biodiverse, influence global biogeochemical cycles, and provide valued services. However, humans are increasingly degrading fluvial ecosystems by altering their streamflows. Effective river restoration requires advancing our mechanistic understanding of how flow regimes affect biota and ecosystem processes. Here, we review emerging advances in hydroecology relevant to this goal. Spatiotemporal variation in flow exerts direct and indirect control on the composition, structure, and dynamics of communities at local to regional scales. Streamflows also influence ecosystem processes, such as nutrient uptake and transformation, organic matter processing, and ecosystem metabolism. We are deepening our understanding of how biological processes, not just static patterns, affect and are affected by stream ecosystem processes. However, research on this nexus of flow-biota-ecosystem processes is at an early stage. We illustrate this frontier with evidence from highly altered regulated rivers and urban streams. We also identify research challenges that should be prioritized to advance process-based river restoration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aaw2087

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palmer, M., & Ruhi, A.
Affiliations
  • National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (US)
  • Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Corresponding author
Palmer, Margaret
Venue
Science
Published
2019-09-20
Volume
365
Issue
6459
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2973781695
Cited by
791
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 116 · 2025: 170 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Keywords
flow regimes, river restoration, hydroecology, streamflow change, regulated rivers, urban rivers, ecosystem processes, organic matter processing, ecosystem metabolism
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Environmental Monitoring, Urbanization, Water Movements, Ecosystem, Food Chain, Rivers, Environmental Restoration and Remediation, Biota, Hydrology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review