Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Passenger hotspot mutations in cancer driven by APOBEC3A and mesoscale genomic features

Buisson, Rémi, Langenbucher, Adam, Bowen, Danae, Kwan, Eugene E., Benes, Cyril H., Zou, Lee, Lawrence, Michael S.·2019·Science

Abstract

APOBEC3A hairpin passenger hotspots: Genomic features are often examined at extremes to determine the impact of mutations. These genomic regions span from the trinucleotide context to megabases that underlie chromatin and chromosomal features. Examining mutational dynamics at the mesoscale, the intermediate span of the genome, Buisson et al. characterized the mutational dynamics of cancer (see the Perspective by Carter). They found that mutations caused by the APOBEC enzyme in DNA stem-loops, a mesoscale feature of the genome, could drive recurrent mutations. Many of these types of mutations have been identified as likely drivers of cancer. However, APOBEC-generated mutations outside of stem-loops were more likely to be cancer driver mutations, providing a genomic context for separating cancer driver from passenger mutations. Science , this issue p. eaaw2872 ; see also p. 1228

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aaw2872

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A3A showed a preferred dinucleotide UC motif for editing.

    “A3A showed a preferred dinucleotide UC motif, consistent with previous reports about the preferred motif for A3A-mediated editing of cellular RNA targets25,54.”

    From The roles of APOBEC-mediated RNA editing in SARS-CoV-2 mutations, replication and fitness (2022) · cites this paper as [54]

    In “APOBEC3A prefers substrate sites in DNA stem-loops” (page unavailable), the paper links A3A activity to TpC dinucleotides in DNA. “Sequence contexts regulating APOBEC3A and mutation accumulation in tumors” further identifies preferred DNA sequence contexts. It does not establish a UC preference for editing cellular RNA targets; the supported finding concerns the analogous DNA motif. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some cellular RNA targets with stem-loop structures are favored by A3A and A1 editing.

    “Prior reports show that some cellular RNA targets with stem-loop structures are favored by A3A and A1 editing25,28,34,54.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1038/nature12213 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nbt.3391 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.024 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.018 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1126/science.1181369 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/ng.363 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nrg3098 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/nature17661 · DOI
  9. 10.1101/gr.231688.117 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1093/nar/gkx731 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.050 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.021 · DOI
  13. 10.1101/gr.197046.115 · DOI
  14. 10.1101/gr.098947.109 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/nar/gkm186 · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1460 · DOI
  17. 10.7717/peerj.4136 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/ng.2702 · DOI
  19. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1753 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/ng.3378 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/nature11881 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/ng.2701 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/ncomms12918 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/carcin/bgx131 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/s41598-018-25881-z · DOI
  26. 10.1038/nsmb.3344 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/ncomms15024 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/nature22992 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/ng.3564 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.042 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.7554/eLife.30862 · DOI
  32. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00286 · DOI
  33. 10.3892/or.2017.5671 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s41598-017-15979-1 · DOI
  35. 10.15252/emmm.201606646 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.002 · DOI
  37. 10.1534/g3.114.012849 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/gbe/evq039 · DOI
  39. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000027 · DOI
  40. J. M. Hess A. Bernards J. Kim M. Miller A. Taylor-Weiner N. J. Haradhvala M. S. Lawrence G. Getz Passenger Hotspot Mutations in Cancer. bioRxiv 675801 [preprint]. 19 June 2019. · DOI
  41. 10.1038/nsmb.1744 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.cels.2018.03.002 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/ng.2591 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/ng.3934 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1128/JVI.01089-09 · DOI
  46. 10.1074/jbc.M110.102822 · DOI
  47. 10.1074/jbc.M113.458661 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.012 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/nar/gkv935 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/embor.2011.46 · DOI
  51. 10.7554/eLife.01222 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Buisson, R., Langenbucher, A., Bowen, D., Kwan, E. E., Benes, C. H., Zou, L., & Lawrence, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Department of Biological Chemistry, Center for Epigenetics and Metabolism, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Venue
Science
Published
2019-06-28
Volume
364
Issue
6447
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
318
References
6
Language
en
Funders
NIH Office of the Director (1K99CA212154, GM076388, CA197779)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review