Progress in natural capital accounting for ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
Global statistical standards are being developed
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The service 'maintaining rainfall patterns' is important to consider in ecosystem services studies, including those of IPBES and SEEA-EA.
“Finally, our paper shows the importance of considering the service 'maintaining rainfall patterns' in ecosystem services studies including those of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and the System of Environmental Economic Accounting-Ecosystem Accounting (e.g.Hein et al 2020).”
From The impact of deforestation on rainfall in Africa: a data-driven assessment (2021) · cites this paper as Hein et al 2020
The passages available from our copy are bibliographic metadata (labeled Abstract, no page given), not discussion of ecosystem services. Searches for “maintaining rainfall patterns” and for rainfall or precipitation in relation to IPBES and SEEA-EA found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThis service is underestimated-it is not usually included in either ecosystem services assessments or accounting efforts.
“This service is underestimated-it is not usually included in either ecosystem services assessments or accounting efforts.”
From The impact of deforestation on rainfall in Africa: a data-driven assessment (2021) · cites this paper as Hein et al 2020
The indexed passages contain bibliographic metadata rather than the paper’s discussion. Searches for an underestimated ecosystem service and its omission from assessments or accounts found no passage addressing the claim, so our copy cannot verify it. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impact of deforestation on rainfall in Africa: a data-driven assessment
Duku, C., & Hein, L. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abfcfb · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Hein, L., Bagstad, K. J., Obst, C., Edens, B., Schenau, S., Castillo, G., Soulard, F., Brown, C., Driver, A., Bordt, M., Steurer, A., Harris, R., & Caparrós, A.
- Affiliations
- See supplementary materials for author affiliations.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2020-01-31
- Volume
- 367
- Issue
- 6477
- Pages
- 514-515
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W3003182401
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 28
- FWCI
- 39.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
- Keywords
- natural capital accounting, ecosystem services, environmental accounting, ecosystem valuation
- MeSH terms
- Statistics as Topic, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
