Embattled Russian scientist sharpens plans to create gene-edited babies
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some researchers currently conducting human germline genome editing research, including Shoukhrat Mitalipov and Denis Rebrikov, openly acknowledge heritable genome editing as their ultimate aim.
“Some researchers currently conducting human germline genome editing research, including Shoukhrat Mitalipov 48 and Denis Rebrikov, 49 openly acknowledge heritable genome editing as their ultimate aim.”
From Human Germline and Heritable Genome Editing: The Global Policy Landscape (2020) · cites this paper as [49]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CRISPR–Cas9: A History of Its Discovery and Ethical Considerations of Its Use in Genome Editing
Gostimskaya, I. (2022) · Biochemistry (Moscow) · doi:10.1134/s0006297922080090 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Human Germline and Heritable Genome Editing: The Global Policy Landscape
Baylis, F., Darnovsky, M., Hasson, K., & Krahn, T. M. (2020) · The CRISPR Journal · doi:10.1089/crispr.2020.0082 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“Some researchers currently conducting human germline genome editing research, including Shoukhrat Mitalipov 48 and Denis Rebrikov, 49 openly acknowledge heritable genome editing as their ultimate aim.”
- Venue
- AAAS Articles DO Group
- Published
- 2021-03-29
- OpenAlex
- W2981322674
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AAAS Articles DO Group (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
- Keywords
- genome editing, human embryo, germline editing, CRISPR/Cas9, reproductive cloning, bioethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
