Cited by 224CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseAnimal Genetics and Reproduction

CRISPR–Cas9: A History of Its Discovery and Ethical Considerations of Its Use in Genome Editing

Open access
Gostimskaya, Irina·2022·Biochemistry (Moscow)

Abstract

The development of a method for genome editing based on CRISPR–Cas9 technology was awarded The Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2020, less than a decade after the discovery of all principal molecular components of the system. For the first time in history a Nobel prize was awarded to two women, Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna, who made key discoveries in the field of DNA manipulation with the CRISPR–Cas9 system, so-called "genetic scissors". It is difficult to overestimate the importance of the technique as it enables one not only to manipulate genomes of model organisms in scientific experiments, and modify characteristics of important crops and animals, but also has the potential of introducing revolutionary changes in medicine, especially in treatment of genetic diseases. The original biological function of CRISPR–Cas9 system is the protection of prokaryotes from mobile genetic elements, in particular viruses. Currently, CRISPR–Cas9 and related technologies have been successfully used to cure life-threatening diseases, make coronavirus detection tests, and even to modify human embryo cells with the consequent birth of babies carrying the introduced modifications. This intervention with human germplasm cells resulted in wide disapproval in the scientific community due to ethical concerns, and calls for a moratorium on inheritable genomic manipulations. This review focuses on the history of the discovery of the CRISPR–Cas9 system with some aspects of its current applications, including ethical concerns about its use in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1134/s0006297922080090

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Regalado, A. (2019) China’s CRISPR babies: read exclusive excerpts from the unseen original research, MIT Technology Review. Biotechnology.
  2. Regalado, A. (2019) Why the paper on the CRISPR babies stayed secret for so long, MIT Technology Review. Biotechnology.
  3. Regalado, A. (2022) The creator of the CRISPR babies has been released from a Chinese prison, MIT Technology Review. Biotechnology.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Gostimskaya, I.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Gostimskaya, Irina
Venue
Biochemistry (Moscow)
Published
2022-08
Volume
87
Issue
8
Pages
777-788
ISSN
  • 0006-2979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1608-3040
OpenAlex
W4291808634
Cited by
224
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 34 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochemistry (Moscow) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, genome editing, Emmanuelle Charpentier, Jennifer Doudna, mobile genetic elements, germline modification, ethics of gene editing, coronavirus detection
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Animals, Female, Humans, Viruses, Genomics, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review