Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Post-2020 goals overlook genetic diversity

Open access
Laikre, Linda, Hoban, Sean, Bruford, Michael W., Segelbacher, Gernot, Allendorf, Fred W., Gajardo, Gonzalo, Rodríguez, Antonio González, Hedrick, Philip W., Heuertz, Myriam, Hohenlohe, Paul A., Jaffé, Rodolfo, Johannesson, Kerstin, Liggins, Libby, MacDonald, Anna J., OrozcoterWengel, Pablo, Reusch, Thorsten B. H., Rodríguez-Correa, Hernando, Russo, Isa-Rita M., Ryman, Nils, Vernesi, Cristiano·2020·Science

Abstract

In January, the secretariat of the \nConvention on Biological Diversity (CBD) \nreleased the first draft of a post-2020 \nglobal biodiversity framework with goals \nand targets for biodiversity (1, 2). We are \ndeeply concerned that the goal suggested \nfor genetic diversity—the basic element \nfor evolutionary processes and all biological diversity—is weak. Abundant scientific \nevidence recognizes the crucial role of \nintraspecific genetic diversity in ecosystem \nresilience, species survival, and adaptation, \nespecially under increased threats of climate change, habitat loss, and diseases (3). \nThe new goals should correct omissions in \nthe previous strategy document.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abb2748

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Laikre, L., Hoban, S., Bruford, M. W., Segelbacher, G., Allendorf, F. W., Gajardo, G., Rodríguez, A. G., Hedrick, P. W., Heuertz, M., Hohenlohe, P. A., Jaffé, R., Johannesson, K., Liggins, L., MacDonald, A. J., OrozcoterWengel, P., Reusch, T. B. H., Rodríguez-Correa, H., Russo, I.-R. M., Ryman, N., & Vernesi, C.
Venue
Science
Published
2020-03-06
Volume
367
Issue
6482
Pages
1083-1085
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3009635362
Cited by
257
References
1
FWCI
21.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.