Cited by 8Forest Management and PolicyConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementFire effects on ecosystems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Forest mismanagement” misleads

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abe9647

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. “California's disastrous forest mismanagement ” National Review (2020).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schwartz, M. W., Thorne, J. H., Collins, B. M., & Stine, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Schwartz, Mark W.
Venue
Science
Published
2020-10-23
Volume
370
Issue
6515
Pages
417-417
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3094215665
Cited by
8
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
Keywords
forest management, forest conservation, deforestation
MeSH terms
Wildfires, California, Politics, Forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review