Cited by 373Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesChromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenome Rearrangement Algorithms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Segmental duplications and their variation in a complete human genome

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Despite their importance in disease and evolution, highly identical segmental duplications (SDs) are among the last regions of the human reference genome (GRCh38) to be fully sequenced. Using a complete telomere-to-telomere human genome (T2T-CHM13), we present a comprehensive view of human SD organization. SDs account for nearly one-third of the additional sequence, increasing the genome-wide estimate from 5.4 to 7.0% [218 million base pairs (Mbp)]. An analysis of 268 human genomes shows that 91% of the previously unresolved T2T-CHM13 SD sequence (68.3 Mbp) better represents human copy number variation. Comparing long-read assemblies from human ( n = 12) and nonhuman primate ( n = 5) genomes, we systematically reconstruct the evolution and structural haplotype diversity of biomedically relevant and duplicated genes. This analysis reveals patterns of structural heterozygosity and evolutionary differences in SD organization between humans and other primates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abj6965

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 118 references

2 of the 118 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. N. Arnheim in Evolution of Genes and Proteins M. Nei R. K. Koehn Eds. (Sinauer 1983) pp. 38–61.
  2. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Standing Committee on Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature ISCN 1995: An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature: Recommendations of the International Standing Committee on Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers 1995).
  4. 10.12688/f1000research.29032.2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. M. R. Vollger Assemblies and data generated for “Segmental duplications and their variation in a complete human genome” (2021) https://zenodo.org/record/4726156. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 373

Metadata

Authors
Vollger, M. R., Guitart, X., Dishuck, P. C., Mercuri, L., Harvey, W. T., Gershman, A., Diekhans, M., Sulovari, A., Munson, K. M., Lewis, A. P., Hoekzema, K., Porubsky, D., Li, R., Nurk, S., Koren, S., Miga, K. H., Phillippy, A. M., Timp, W., Ventura, M., & Eichler, E. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Eichler, Evan E.
Venue
Science
Published
2022-04
Volume
376
Issue
6588
Pages
eabj6965-eabj6965
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4225379371
Cited by
350
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 41
FWCI
47.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Oxford Nanopore Technologies
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG010973, U01HG010971, U41HG007234, R01HG009190, R01HG011274, R01HG002385, U24HG007234)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007445)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
Keywords
segmental duplication, human genome, telomere-to-telomere genome assembly, T2T-CHM13, copy number variation, structural heterozygosity, duplicate genes, long-read genome assembly, genome evolution
MeSH terms
Humans, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Genome, Human, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Duplication, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, GTPase-Activating Proteins, DNA Copy Number Variations, Segmental Duplications, Genomic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review