Cited by 79Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

Variational benchmarks for quantum many-body problems

Open access
Wu, Dian, Rossi, Riccardo, Vicentini, Filippo, Astrakhantsev, Nikita, Becca, Federico, Cao, Xiaodong, Carrasquilla, Juan, Ferrari, Francesco +25 more·2024·Science

Abstract

The continued development of computational approaches to many-body ground-state problems in physics and chemistry calls for a consistent way to assess its overall progress. In this work, we introduce a metric of variational accuracy, the V-score, obtained from the variational energy and its variance. We provide an extensive curated dataset of variational calculations of many-body quantum systems, identifying cases where state-of-the-art numerical approaches show limited accuracy and future algorithms or computational platforms, such as quantum computing, could provide improved accuracy. The V-score can be used as a metric to assess the progress of quantum variational methods toward a quantum advantage for ground-state problems, especially in regimes where classical verifiability is impossible.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.adg9774

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the ground-state problem, variational Monte Carlo method provides a numerical method for ground-state estimation that is competitive with other state-of-the-art approaches such as tensor networks or quantum Monte Carlo.

    “For the ground-state problem, the variational Monte Carlo method 130 provides a numerical method for ground-state estimation that is competitive with other state-of-the-art approaches such as tensor networks or quantum Monte Carlo 131 .”

    From Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation (2025) · cites this paper as [131]

    The Variational Monte Carlo section (p. 13) describes VMC as a tractable method for finding ground states, and the comparison section (p. 21) reports that VMC-based neural quantum states outperform traditional methods on certain 2D models. But the paper makes that comparison for specific systems; it does not establish that VMC is generally competitive with tensor networks or quantum Monte Carlo. The Quantum Monte Carlo section (p. 19) instead describes QMC results as accuracy benchmarks for variational methods. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 146 · Cited by 79

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [2]F. Becca and S. Sorella, Quantum Monte Carlo Approaches for Correlated Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2017).
  2. [3]S. Zhang, Auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo at zeroand finite-temperature, in Many-Body Methods for Real Materials , Vol. 9 (Verlag des Forschungszentrum J¨ ulich, 2019).
  3. [15]A. Y. Kitaev, Quantum measurements and the abelian stabilizer problem (1995), arXiv:quant-ph/9511026. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9511026 · arXiv
  4. [20]E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser, Quantum computation by adiabatic evolution (2000), arXiv:quant-ph/0001106. · arXiv
  5. [22]R. M. Parrish and P. L. McMahon, Quantum filter diagonalization: Quantum eigendecomposition without full quantum phase estimation (2019), arXiv:1909.08925. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.08925 · arXiv
  6. [34]S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
  7. [35]X.-G. Wen, Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Systems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons (Oxford University Press, 2004).
  8. [39]A. C. Hewson, The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
  9. [40]J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 276 , 238 (1963).
  10. [47]L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80 , 016502 (2016).
  11. [60]D. Aharonov, X. Gao, Z. Landau, Y. Liu, and U. Vazirani, A polynomial-time classical algorithm for noisy random circuit sampling, in Proceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (2023) pp. 945-957.
  12. [61]A. J. Daley, I. Bloch, C. Kokail, S. Flannigan, N. Pearson, M. Troyer, and P. Zoller, Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation, Nature 607 , 667 (2022).
  13. [65]M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor software library for tensor network calculations (2020), arXiv:2007.14822. · arXiv
  14. [75]M. C. J. Eisert and M. B. Plenio, Area laws for the entanglement entropy - a review, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 , 277 (2008).
  15. [89]D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, in 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (2015).
  16. [99]R. Kaneko, S. Morita, and M. Imada, Improved multivariable variational Monte Carlo method examined by high-precision calculations of one-dimensional Hubbard model, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 454 , 012046 (2013).
  17. Rev. B 100 , 125131 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.125131 · DOI
  18. [117]C. Roth and A. H. MacDonald, Group convolutional neural networks improve quantum state accuracy (2021), arXiv:2104.05085. · arXiv
  19. [120]C. Roth, Iterative retraining of quantum spin models using recurrent neural networks (2020), arXiv:2003.06228. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.06228 · arXiv
  20. [122]M. Hibat-Allah, R. G. Melko, and J. Carrasquilla, Supplementing recurrent neural network wave functions with symmetry and annealing to improve accuracy, in NeurIPS 2021 Workshop on Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences (2021).
  21. [131]J. R. Moreno, G. Carleo, A. Georges, and J. Stokes, Fermionic wave functions from neural-network constrained hidden states, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119 , e2122059119 (2022).
  22. [132]S. Sorella, The phase diagram of the Hubbard model by variational auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo (2021), arXiv:2101.07045. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.07045 · arXiv
  23. [137]M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2010).

Authors
Wu, D., Rossi, R., Vicentini, F., Astrakhantsev, N., Becca, F., Cao, X., Carrasquilla, J., Ferrari, F., Georges, A., Hibat-Allah, M., Imada, M., Läuchli, A. M., Mazzola, G., Mezzacapo, A., Millis, A., Robledo Moreno, J., Neupert, T., Nomura, Y., Nys, J., Parcollet, O., Pohle, R., Romero, I., Schmid, M., Silvester, J. M., Sorella, S., Tocchio, L. F., Wang, L., White, S. R., Wietek, A., Yang, Q., Yang, Y., Zhang, S., & Carleo, G.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Trieste (IT)
  • Flatiron Institute (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Waseda University (JP)
  • Paul Scherrer Institute (CH)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
  • Center for Computational Quantum Physics, Flatiron Institute, New York, NY 10010, USA.
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
  • Politecnico di Torino (IT)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems (DE)
  • William & Mary (US)
Corresponding author
Carleo, Giuseppe
Venue
Science
Published
2024-10-18
Volume
386
Issue
6719
Pages
296-301
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4403511026
Cited by
79
References
146
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
  • DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2110041, 205602)
  • Simons Foundation
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • Compute Canada
  • Flatiron Health
  • Government of Canada
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (509755282, WI 5899/1-1)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (JPMJPF2221, hp210163, hp220166, JPMXP1020230411, JP19H00658, JPMXP1020200104, JP22H05114, JP22H05111)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (200336, 205602, 203455, 176877)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (92270107, 12188101)
  • Institut Périmètre de physique théorique
  • Ministry of Colleges and Universities
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP23H04869, 23H04869, JP22H05114, JP23H04519, 23K03307, JP22H05111)
  • RIKEN (hp210163, JPMXP1020200104, JPMXP1020230411, hp220166)
  • National Center of Competence in Research Materials’ Revolution: Computational Design and Discovery of Novel Materials (205602)
  • Division of Materials Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
variational energy, energy variance, benchmark dataset, variational quantum algorithms, quantum advantage, variational quantum eigensolver, quantum computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review