Cited by 33Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorWildlife Ecology and ConservationMusic and Audio Processing

Sound evidence for biodiversity monitoring

Open access
Rasmussen, Jeppe H., Stowell, Dan, Briefer, Elodie F.·2024·Science

Abstract

Bioacoustics and artificial intelligence facilitate ecological studies of animal populations

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.adh2716

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining long-term soundscapes and mechanistic ecological models yields early-warning indicators that could outperform abundance-only monitoring.

    “Combine that with long-term soundscapes and mechanistic ecological models, and you get early-warning indicators that could outperform abundance-only monitoring (Bury et al. 2021; Rasmussen et al. 2024; Stowell and Sueur 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]13. Symposium , pp 13-22 (2010). 159 - 13.J. Rasmussen et al ., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 149.5 , 3635 (2021). 160 - 14.E. F. Briefer et al. , Sci. Rep. 12 , 3409 (2022). 161 - 15.T. Sainburg et al ., Front. Behav. Neurosci. 15, 811737 (2021). 162 163 164 165 166 - Supported by the Carlsberg Foundation (CF22-1389 to JHR and CF20-0538 to EFB). We 167 - thank anonymous reviewers, Morten Goodwin, Grzegorz Chrupała, Jillian Sills, Rebekah 168 - Oomen, Eva van Massenhoeve and Roi Mandel for useful suggestions. 169

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rasmussen, J. H., Stowell, D., & Briefer, E. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Naturalis Biodiversity Center (NL)
Venue
Science
Published
2024-07-12
Volume
385
Issue
6705
Pages
138-140
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4400525718
Cited by
33
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 1
FWCI
13.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
bioacoustics, biodiversity monitoring, artificial intelligence, animal populations, acoustic monitoring
MeSH terms
Biological Monitoring, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Biodiversity, Extinction, Biological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review