Cited by 30Race, Genetics, and SocietyArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Implications of predicting race variables from medical images

Zou, James, Gichoya, Judy Wawira, Ho, Daniel E., Obermeyer, Ziad·2023·Science

Abstract

AI-predicted race variables pose risks and opportunities for studying health disparities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.adh4260

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 'race signal' (or societal standing in general) in images may be used to inform clinical predictions and optimizations, especially in multimodal modeling.

    “The “race signal” (or societal standing in general) in images may be used to inform clinical predictions and optimizations especially in this era of multimodal modeling. 31”

    From AI pitfalls and what not to do: mitigating bias in AI (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zou, J., Gichoya, J. W., Ho, D. E., & Obermeyer, Z.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Science
Published
2023-07-14
Volume
381
Issue
6654
Pages
149-150
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4384155308
Cited by
30
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
medical images, racial classification, health disparities, algorithmic bias, racial misclassification, health equity
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Racial Groups, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review