As artificial intelligence goes multimodal, medical applications multiply
Abstract
Machines don't have eyes, but you wouldn't know that if you followed the progression of deep learning models for accurate interpretation of medical images, such as x-rays, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, pathology slides, and retinal photos. Over the past several years, there has been a torrent of studies that have consistently demonstrated how powerful "machine eyes" can be, not only compared with medical experts but also for detecting features in medical images that are not readily discernable by humans. For example, a retinal scan is rich with information that people can't see, but machines can, providing a gateway to multiple aspects of human physiology, including blood pressure; glucose control; risk of Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, kidney, and hepatobiliary diseases; and the likelihood of heart attacks and strokes. As a cardiologist, I would not have envisioned that machine interpretation of an electrocardiogram would provide information about the individual's age, sex, anemia, risk of developing diabetes or arrhythmias, heart function and valve disease, kidney, or thyroid conditions. Likewise, applying deep learning to a pathology slide of tumor tissue can also provide insight about the site of origin, driver mutations, structural genomic variants, and prognosis. Although these machine vision capabilities for medical image interpretation may seem impressive, they foreshadow what is potentially far more expansive terrain for artificial i…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Generative AI has the potential to make a breakthrough in medical diagnostic applications, given its capability to build models using multimodal medical data.
“This subset of AI has the potential to make a breakthrough in medical diagnostic applications, given its capability to build models using multimodal medical data [5].”
From Generative AI in medical practice: in-depth exploration of privacy and security challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 132
- Authors
- Topol, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Scripps Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Topol, Eric J.
- ORCID
- Topol, Eric J.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2023-09-15
- Volume
- 381
- Issue
- 6663
- Pages
- adk6139-adk6139
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W4386736797
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 5
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- multimodal AI, medical image interpretation, deep learning, fundus images, ECG interpretation, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, X-rays, clinical decision support
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Blood Pressure, Electrocardiography, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review