Cited by 132Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsMachine Learning in Healthcare

As artificial intelligence goes multimodal, medical applications multiply

Topol, Eric J.·2023·Science

Abstract

Machines don't have eyes, but you wouldn't know that if you followed the progression of deep learning models for accurate interpretation of medical images, such as x-rays, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, pathology slides, and retinal photos. Over the past several years, there has been a torrent of studies that have consistently demonstrated how powerful "machine eyes" can be, not only compared with medical experts but also for detecting features in medical images that are not readily discernable by humans. For example, a retinal scan is rich with information that people can't see, but machines can, providing a gateway to multiple aspects of human physiology, including blood pressure; glucose control; risk of Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, kidney, and hepatobiliary diseases; and the likelihood of heart attacks and strokes. As a cardiologist, I would not have envisioned that machine interpretation of an electrocardiogram would provide information about the individual's age, sex, anemia, risk of developing diabetes or arrhythmias, heart function and valve disease, kidney, or thyroid conditions. Likewise, applying deep learning to a pathology slide of tumor tissue can also provide insight about the site of origin, driver mutations, structural genomic variants, and prognosis. Although these machine vision capabilities for medical image interpretation may seem impressive, they foreshadow what is potentially far more expansive terrain for artificial i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.adk6139

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generative AI has the potential to make a breakthrough in medical diagnostic applications, given its capability to build models using multimodal medical data.

    “This subset of AI has the potential to make a breakthrough in medical diagnostic applications, given its capability to build models using multimodal medical data [5].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 132

Authors
Topol, E. J.
Affiliations
Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Topol, Eric J.
Venue
Science
Published
2023-09-15
Volume
381
Issue
6663
Pages
adk6139-adk6139
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4386736797
Cited by
132
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 5
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
multimodal AI, medical image interpretation, deep learning, fundus images, ECG interpretation, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, X-rays, clinical decision support
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Blood Pressure, Electrocardiography, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review