Cited by 117Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Multiple protein structure alignment at scale with FoldMason

Open access
Gilchrist, Cameron L. M., Mirdita, Milot, Steinegger, Martin·2026·Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein structure is conserved beyond sequence, making multiple structural alignment (MSTA) essential for analyzing distantly related proteins. Computational prediction methods have vastly extended our repository of available protein structures, requiring fast and accurate MSTA methods. We introduce FoldMason, a progressive MSTA method that leverages the pairwise structural aligners Foldseek and TM-align for the multiple alignment of hundreds of thousands of protein structures, matching or exceeding the alignment quality of state-of-the-art MSTA methods while being two orders of magnitude faster. Using Flaviviridae glycoproteins, we demonstrate that FoldMason’s MSTAs support phylogenetic analysis beyond the “twilight zone.” FoldMason computes confidence scores, offers interactive visualizations, and provides essential speed and accuracy for large-scale protein structure analysis in the era of accurate structure prediction. FoldMason is free, open-source software.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.ads6733

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilchrist, C. L. M., Mirdita, M., & Steinegger, M.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Steinegger, Martin
Venue
Science
Published
2026-01-29
Volume
391
Issue
6784
Pages
485-488
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W7126115639
Cited by
117
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 4
FWCI
115.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Seoul National University (Samsung DS research fund, Creative Pioneering Researchers Program, AI-Bio Research Grant)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2020M3-A9G7-103933, RS-2021-NR061659, RS-2021-NR056571, RS-2024-00396026, RS-2023-00250470)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (RS-2024-00440614)
  • KBSI internal research programs (C539200)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
progressive alignment, Foldseek, TM-align, structural alignment, phylogenetic analysis, structural conservation, confidence scores, interactive visualization, open source software
MeSH terms
Glycoproteins, Phylogeny, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Viral Envelope Proteins, Sequence Alignment, Flaviviridae, Computational Biology, Structural Homology, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review