Cited by 608Robotic Path Planning AlgorithmsModular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems

Swarm of micro flying robots in the wild

Zhou, Xin, Wen, Xiangyong, Wang, Zhepei, Gao, Yuman, Li, Haojia, Wang, Qianhao, Yang, Tiankai, Lu, Haojian +3 more·2022·Science Robotics

Abstract

Aerial robots are widely deployed, but highly cluttered environments such as dense forests remain inaccessible to drones and even more so to swarms of drones. In these scenarios, previously unknown surroundings and narrow corridors combined with requirements of swarm coordination can create challenges. To enable swarm navigation in the wild, we develop miniature but fully autonomous drones with a trajectory planner that can function in a timely and accurate manner based on limited information from onboard sensors. The planning problem satisfies various task requirements including flight efficiency, obstacle avoidance, and inter-robot collision avoidance, dynamical feasibility, swarm coordination, and so on, thus realizing an extensible planner. Furthermore, the proposed planner deforms trajectory shapes and adjusts time allocation synchronously based on spatial-temporal joint optimization. A high-quality trajectory thus can be obtained after exhaustively exploiting the solution space within only a few milliseconds, even in the most constrained environment. The planner is finally integrated into the developed palm-sized swarm platform with onboard perception, localization, and control. Benchmark comparisons validate the superior performance of the planner in trajectory quality and computing time. Various real-world field experiments demonstrate the extensibility of our system. Our approach evolves aerial robotics in three aspects: capability of cluttered environment navigation, extensibility to diverse task requirements, and coordination as a swarm without external facilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scirobotics.abm5954

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. G. Bishop, G. Welch, An introduction to the kalman filter, Proc of SIGGRAPH. Course 8, 41 (2001).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, X., Wen, X., Wang, Z., Gao, Y., Li, H., Wang, Q., Yang, T., Lu, H., Cao, Y., Xu, C., & Gao, F.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology (CN)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xu, Chao
  • Gao, Fei
Venue
Science Robotics
Published
2022-05-25
Volume
7
Issue
66
Pages
eabm5954-eabm5954
ISSN
2470-9476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4229007520
Cited by
608
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 122 · 2025: 206 · 2024: 142 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 26
FWCI
39.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Keywords
UAV swarms, trajectory planning, cluttered environments, dense forest, obstacle avoidance, swarm coordination, autonomous drones, field experiments
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Humans, Robotics, Speech Disorders, Sports, Benchmarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review