Cited by 140Retinal Development and DisordersVirus-based gene therapy researchRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Safety and efficacy of subretinal readministration of a viral vector in large animals to treat congenital blindness

Open access
Amado, Defne, Mingozzi, Federico, Hui, Daniel, Bennicelli, Jeannette L., Wei, Zhangyong, Chen, Yifeng, Bote, Erin, Grant, Rebecca L. +7 more·2010·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

After successful gene therapy to correct retinal degeneration in one eye, treatment of the second eye is safe and effective—even when immunity to the vector is present—in nonhuman primates and dogs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000659

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AAV administration to immune privileged regions can lead to increases in neutralizing antibody titers, including after intravitreal injection in dogs and NHPs and intracranial injections in clinical trials.

    “Furthermore, AAV administration to immune privileged regions can lead to increases in neutralizing antibody titers, including following intravitreal injection in dogs and non-human primates37 and following intracranial injections in several clinical trials.38”

    From Antibody neutralization poses a barrier to intravitreal adeno-associated viral vector gene delivery to non-human primates (2015) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Results sections on immune responses in dogs and NHPs report increased AAV2 neutralizing-antibody titers after ocular vector administration. But the Results section on bilateral readministration specifies that the vector was injected subretinally, not intravitreally; the intravitreal injection mentioned there was ciprofloxacin. The intracranial-trial clause is attached to a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • AAV serotype, virus dose, re-administration, promoter, and transgene can influence immune responses to ocular AAV gene delivery.

    “Other factors that can influence the immune responses are the AAV serotype used,18 the virus dose injected,19 whether the injection is re-administrated,20 and the promoter21,22 and transgene used.23”
  • Prior studies reported that subretinal AAV vector injections in dogs and non-human primates, and some intracranial injections in clinical trials, increased serum anti-AAV antibody titers.

    “This observation is consistent with previous reports that subretinal injections of AAV vectors in dogs and non-human primates,37 as well as some intracranial injections in several clinical trials,38 led to increased serum anti-AAV antibody titers.”
  • AAV vectors are less susceptible to antibody neutralisation within a more immune privileged space.

    “AAV vectors are also less susceptible to antibody neutralisation within a more immune privileged space (Li et al., 2008; Amado et al., 2010).”
  • The effectiveness of subretinal gene therapy does not seem to be affected by the presence of neutralising antibodies in the host serum.

    “the effectiveness of subretinal gene therapy does not seem to be affected by the presence of neutralising antibodies in the host serum [287].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 140

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Muzyczka N Berns K Knipe D Howley P Fields Virology 2001 2 2327 2359 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia

Authors
Amado, D., Mingozzi, F., Hui, D., Bennicelli, J. L., Wei, Z., Chen, Y., Bote, E., Grant, R. L., Golden, J. A., Narfstrom, K., Syed, N. A., Orlin, S. E., High, K. A., Maguire, A. M., & Bennett, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Abramson Pediatric Research Center, Philadelphia, PA 19014, USA.
  • College of Veterinary Medicine and Mason Eye Institute, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65212, USA.
  • University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
  • Amado, Defne
  • Mingozzi, Federico
  • Bennett, Jean
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2010-03-03
Volume
2
Issue
21
Pages
21ra16-21ra16
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2077204087
Cited by
140
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (5f30ag030961-02)
  • National Institute on Aging (1F30AG030961, F30 AG030961)
  • National Eye Institute (P30EY001583)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
Leber congenital amaurosis, RPE65 mutations, subretinal gene therapy, fellow eye, neutralizing antibodies, cell-mediated immunity, CD4+ T cells, retinal degeneration, visual recovery, large animal model
MeSH terms
Retinoid Isomerohydrolase, Dependovirus, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Anterior Chamber, Blindness, Capsid, Carrier Proteins, Dogs, Drug Administration Routes, Eye Proteins, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Immunity, Immunohistochemistry, Middle Aged, Postmortem Changes, Primates, Retina, Genetic Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Titrimetry, cis-trans-Isomerases, Antibodies, Neutralizing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review