Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Squalene epoxidase drives NAFLD-induced hepatocellular carcinoma and is a pharmaceutical target

Liu, Dabin, Wong, Chi Chun, Fu, Li, Chen, Huarong, Zhao, Liuyang, Li, Chuangen, Zhou, Yunfei, Zhang, Yanquan, Xu, Weiqi, Yang, Yidong, Wu, Bin, Cheng, Gong, Lai, Paul Bo-San, Wong, Nathalie, Sung, Joseph J. Y., Yu, Jun·2018·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

Squalene epoxidase is a therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma arising from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.aap9840

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hepatocyte-specific SQLE transgenic mice have increased SQLE protein abundance, develop hepatosteatosis, and have a similar increase in the NADP+/NADPH ratio.

    “Intriguingly, hepatocyte-specific SQLE transgenic mice which, similar to MARCHF6LKO mice, have increased SQLE protein abundance developed hepatosteatosis and had a similar increase in the NADP+/NADPH ratio [60].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.2174/1381612811319150009 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/hep.28431 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.tem.2014.08.001 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2013.07.003 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/hep.26088 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.tem.2015.11.008 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.01.015 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1002/gcc.1220 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.017 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.029 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001065 · DOI
  13. 10.1074/jbc.R113.479808 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.027 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.026 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009131 · DOI
  17. 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03198.x · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.tig.2012.05.006 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/ng1999 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/ng.406 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/srep19435 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.046 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1091/mbc.02-02-0023 · DOI
  24. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2613 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.01.019 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/onc.2016.162 · DOI
  27. 10.1186/s12885-015-1469-5 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/onc.2016.168 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/106002809703100412 · DOI
  30. 10.1021/ci100403b · DOI
  31. 10.1093/carcin/19.2.287 · DOI
  32. G. S. Kelly, Squalene and its potential clinical uses. Altern. Med. Rev. 4, 29–36 (1999).
  33. 10.1007/BF02536088 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.09.004 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.10.042 · DOI
  36. 10.1096/fj.201601393R · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, D., Wong, C. C., Fu, L., Chen, H., Zhao, L., Li, C., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y., Xu, W., Yang, Y., Wu, B., Cheng, G., Lai, P. B.-S., Wong, N., Sung, J. J. Y., & Yu, J.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Digestive Disease and Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, CUHK Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong.
  • Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
  • Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong.
  • Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong.
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2018-04-18
Volume
10
Issue
437
ISSN
  • 1946-6234
  • 1946-6242
Cited by
257
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review