Cited by 136Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Where Do You Think You Are Going? The NMDA-D1 Receptor Trap

Cepeda, Carlos, Levine, Michael S.·2006·Science's STKE

Abstract

The number and outcomes of reciprocal interactions between dopamine (DA) D1 receptors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-type glutamate receptors continue to increase. Recent studies have demonstrated close physical interactions in which activation of one receptor affects the function of the other. In one physical interaction, the activation of NMDA receptors alters the topography and movement of D1 receptors by trapping them in dendritic spines and thus altering their distribution. In a second physical interaction, D1 and subunits of NMDA receptors form heterodimers, which are translocated from the cell interior to the surface. Finally, a third physical interaction posits that the C terminus of D1 receptors makes contact with subunits of the NMDA receptor. These physical interactions can attenuate or potentiate receptor function. In contrast, the more traditional interactions mediated by second messengers generally cause NMDA receptor function to be potentiated through the activation of D1 receptors and the cAMP-PKA-DARPP-32 [adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP)-protein kinase A-cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kD] or PKC (protein kinase C) cascades. Together, these mechanisms provide a basis for understanding the increasing complexity of D1-NMDA receptor interactions and their importance in physiological and pathological processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/stke.3332006pe20

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NMDA-Rs and D1Rs within the same cell potentiate each other.

    “NMDA-Rs and D1Rs within the same cell potentiate each other in numerous ways (Cepeda and Levine, 2006)”

    From The Computational Anatomy of Psychosis (2013) · cites this paper as Cepeda and Levine, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cepeda, C., & Levine, M. S.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Science's STKE
Published
2006-05-02
Volume
2006
Issue
333
Pages
pe20-pe20
ISSN
1525-8882 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124168630
Cited by
136
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science s STKE (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
dopamine D1 receptor, NMDA receptor, receptor heterodimerization, dendritic spines, receptor trafficking, protein kinase C signaling, second messenger signaling, glutamate receptor modulation
MeSH terms
Allosteric Regulation, Animals, Mental Disorders, Calcium, Corpus Striatum, Diffusion, Dopamine, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nervous System Diseases, Neurons, Organ Culture Techniques, Synaptic Membranes, Antipsychotic Agents, Drug Design, Signal Transduction, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, N-Methylaspartate, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Receptors, Glutamate, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Glutamic Acid, Protein Subunits, Protein Transport, Protein Interaction Mapping, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review