Cited by 15Plant Growth Enhancement TechniquesSeaweed-derived Bioactive CompoundsAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactions

Influence of the aqueous extracts of Ulva lactuca and Chlorella kessleri on growth and yield of Vicia faba

El-Naggar, Amal H., Osman, Mohamed E.H. El-Sheekh, Gheda, Saly F.·2005·Algological Studies/Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Supplement Volumes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1127/1864-1318/2005/0116-0213

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El-Naggar, A. H., Osman, M. E. H. E.-S., & Gheda, S. F.
Venue
Algological Studies/Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Supplement Volumes
Publisher
Schweizerbart
Published
2005-07-01
Volume
116
Pages
213-229
ISSN
0342-1120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971556996
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Algological Studies/Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement Volumes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Growth Enhancement Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
Keywords
Ulva lactuca, Chlorella kessleri, aqueous plant extract, Vicia faba, crop yield, plant growth promotion, seaweed extract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review