Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fast radiative transfer parameterisation for assessing the surface solar irradiance: The Heliosat‑4 method

Open access
Qu, Zhipeng, Oumbe, Armel, Blanc, Philippe, Espinar, Bella, Gesell, Gerhard, Gschwind, Benoît, Klüser, Lars, Lefèvre, Mireille, Saboret, Laurent, Schroedter-Homscheidt, Marion, Wald, Lucien·2017·Meteorologische Zeitschrift

Abstract

The new Heliosat-4 method estimates the downwelling shortwave irradiance received at ground level in all sky conditions. It provides the global irradiance and its direct and diffuse components on a horizontal plane and the direct irradiance for a plane normal to sun rays. It is a fully physical model using a fast, but still accurate approximation of radiative transfer modelling and is therefore well suited for geostationary satellite retrievals. It can also be used as a fast radiative transfer model in numerical weather prediction models. It is composed of two models based on abaci, also called look-up tables: the already-published McClear model calculating the irradiance under cloud-free conditions and the new McCloud model calculating the extinction of irradiance due to clouds. Both have been realized by using the libRadtran radiative transfer model. The main inputs to Heliosat-4 are aerosol properties, total column water vapour and ozone content as provided by the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) every 3 h. Cloud properties are derived from images of the Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) satellites in their 15min temporal resolution using an adapted APOLLO (AVHRR Processing scheme Over cLouds, Land and Ocean) scheme. The 15min means of irradiance estimated by Heliosat-4 are compared to corresponding measurements made at 13 stations within the Baseline Surface Radiation Network and being located in the field of view ofMSG and in various climates. The bias for global irradiance is comprised between 2 and 32Wm−2. The root mean square error (RMSE) ranges between 74 and 94Wm−2. Relative RMSE values range between 15% and 20% of the mean observed irradiance for stations in desert and Mediterranean climates, and between 26% and 43% for rainy climates with mild winters. Correlation coefficients between 0.91 and 0.97 are found. The bias for the direct irradiance at normal incidence is comprised between −163 and +50Wm−2. The RMSE ranges from 160Wm−2 (29% of the mean observed irradiance) to 288Wm−2 (63%). The correlation coefficient ranges between 0.67 and 0.87.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1127/metz/2016/0781

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Qu, Z., Oumbe, A., Blanc, P., Espinar, B., Gesell, G., Gschwind, B., Klüser, L., Lefèvre, M., Saboret, L., Schroedter-Homscheidt, M., & Wald, L.
Venue
Meteorologische Zeitschrift
Publisher
Schweizerbart
Published
2017-02-13
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
33-57
ISSN
0941-2948 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2592630272
Cited by
257
References
17
FWCI
12.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast radiative transfer parameterisation for assessing the surface solar irradiance: The Heliosat‑4 method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1127/metz/2016/0781
The paper
Qu, Z., Oumbe, A., Blanc, P., Espinar, B., Gesell, G., Gschwind, B., Klüser, L., Lefèvre, M., Saboret, L., Schroedter-Homscheidt, M., & Wald, L. (2017). Fast radiative transfer parameterisation for assessing the surface solar irradiance: The Heliosat‑4 method. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2016/0781

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.