The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Manual of Clinical Microbiology
Abstract
and their disease processes based on evaluation of disease signs and symptoms. As with many infectious disease syndromes, a zoonotic infection often debuts as a nonspecific febrile illness, and a discussion of a common approach to the patient who presents with a nonspecific febrile illness could potentially help clinicians identify specific disease processes in a costefficient and time-efficient manner. The current book format requires that the reader already have some basic knowledge of the specific disease-causing agent(s) and the differential diagnoses for the disease syndrome. There are some minor inaccuracies in a number of the subchapters throughout the book. For example, we know now that 1 of the 3 hunters in Northern Wisconsin who allegedly died of CreutzfeldtJakob disease actually died of Pick disease, which has not been related to prion disease. Chloramphenicol is no longer recommended for treatment of human ehrlichial or anaplasma infections, given the lack of demonstrated in vitro effect and clinical failure in vivo resulting in fatal outcomes for several children. The mortality rate for patients with human anaplasmosis was initially estimated to be as high as 15%. More recent information indicates that the rate is 1% or lower. The impact of these and other inaccuracies on the reading experience as a whole, however, is minor. Abbreviations are frequently used throughout the text, and a short glossary of commonly used laboratory terms can be found in the introductory pages. An expanded glossary that also includes the specific disease names and their abbreviations (such as Japanese encephalitis [JE], St. Louis encephalitis [SLE], human monocytic ehrlichiosis [HME], and others) would have enhanced and expedited the reading experience. Each of the subchapters concludes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular microbiology: diagnostic principles and practice.
Persing, D. H., & Tenover, F. C. (2011) · EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 205
Nakayama, E., & Takada, A. (2011) · Journal of Disaster Research · doi:10.20965/jdr.2011.p0381 · Cited by 21
Cited by
Kalil, A. C., Metersky, M. L., Klompas, M., Muscedere, J., Sweeney, D. A., Palmer, L. B., Napolitano, L. M., O'Grady, N. P., Bartlett, J. G., Carratalà, J., et al. (2016) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciw353 · Cited by 3,892
León, C., Ruiz-Santana, S., Saavedra, P., Almirante, B., Nolla-Salas, J., Álvarez-Lerma, F., Garnacho-Montero, J., & León, M. Á. (2006) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000202208.37364.7d · Cited by 659
An Update on the Roles of Non-albicans Candida Species in Vulvovaginitis
Makanjuola, O., Bongomin, F., & Fayemiwo, S. (2018) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof4040121 · Cited by 182
Mycoplasma bovis in Respiratory Disease of Feedlot Cattle
Caswell, J. L., Bateman, K. G., Cai, H. Y., & Castillo-Alcala, F. (2010) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2010.03.003 · Cited by 148
Eichinger, A., Hagen, A., Meyer-Bühn, M., & Huebner, J. (2019) · Infection · doi:10.1007/s15010-018-1212-7 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Venue
- ASM Press eBooks
- Publisher
- ASM Press
- Published
- 2015-05-15
- OpenAlex
- W2502795403
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.52
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manual of Clinical Microbiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/9781555817381
- The paper
- Manual of Clinical Microbiology. (2015). ASM Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555817381
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.