The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematics and Ecology of Bacillus
Abstract
This chapter provides a review of current ideas concerning the systematics of the aerobic endospore-forming bacteria and shows how an appreciation of their classification and identification makes possible for a better understanding of their ecology. The DNA base composition of thermoactinomycete species is around 50 to 54% G+C, which is much lower than the 60% or more found in the true actinomycetes. 16S rRNA analyses have placed Thermoactinomyces species firmly alongside other thermophilic Bacillus species, and the sequences show very low homology with actinomycete rRNA sequences. It is possible to allocate many Bacillus species to one of six taxa that have distinguishable physiologies and, perhaps surprisingly, are generally consistent with the division of the genus based on spore morphologies. Phylogenetic trees of some members of the genus Bacillus based on 16S rRNA sequence analysis are provided in the chapter. That Bacillus species constitute discrete genetic and phenetic entities raises interesting questions with regard to gene exchange and the evolution of the species. The increased number of well-defined Bacillus species described together with the physiological diversity that they will undoubtedly represent will present a formidable challenge to the taxonomist, but the outcome should be a fascinating insight into the evolutionary history of these bacteria and perhaps of endospore formation itself.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042
Cited by
(EFSA), E. F. S. A. (2007) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2007.587 · Cited by 479
Roles of Bacillus endospores in the environment
Nicholson, W. L. (2002) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS · doi:10.1007/s00018-002-8433-7 · Cited by 444
Okinaka, R. T., Cloud, K., Hampton, O., Hoffmaster, A. R., Hill, K. K., Keim, P., Koehler, T. M., Lamke, G., Kumano, S., Mahillon, J., et al. (1999) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.181.20.6509-6515.1999 · Cited by 391
Kappes, R. M., Kempf, B., Kneip, S., Boch, J., Gade, J., Meier‐Wagner, J., & Bremer, E. (1999) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01354.x · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Priest, F. G.
- Venue
- Bacillus subtilis and Other Gram-Positive Bacteria
- Publisher
- ASM Press
- Published
- 2014-04-30
- Pages
- 1-16
- OpenAlex
- W222910508
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.94
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematics and Ecology of Bacillus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/9781555818388.ch1
- The paper
- Priest, F. G. (2014). Systematics and Ecology of Bacillus. Bacillus subtilis and Other Gram-Positive Bacteria. https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555818388.ch1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.