The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gram-Positive Pathogens
Abstract
specimen handling is emphasised but exact descriptions of smear preparation are not provided.) The final three chapters deal with principles of safe practice, including the role of clinical cytology in patient management, medicolegal considerations, and the contentious issue of the relative merits of fine needle aspiration and core biopsy. The intervening chapters are about specific areas of concern in practice, such as cystic lesions, lymphoid infiltrates and small round cell tumors. It should be apparent that I like this book very much, and it does succeed in its purpose of restating the potential and problems of clinical cytopathology in a way that provides both orientation for the neophyte and advice for the practicing pathologist. Having said that, there are occasional jarring things about it. An inexplicable number of spelling errors are present, including one on the first page! A few sub-standard photomicrographs appear to have been gleaned from other sources, and other photomicrographs seem to be a ‘‘poor fit’’ with the findings described in the text. But these are minor considerations. I intend to have trainees in my institution read the first few chapters several times during their time with the cytology service, and would certainly highly recommend this book to all practicing pathologists having any involvement with cytopathology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chopra, I., & Roberts, M. (2001) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.65.2.232-260.2001 · Cited by 4,517
Proctor, R. A., von Eiff, C., Kahl, B. C., Becker, K., McNamara, P., Herrmann, M., & Peters, G. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1384 · Cited by 1,175
Stress Physiology of Lactic Acid Bacteria.
Papadimitriou, K., Alegría, Á., Bron, P. A., de Angelis, M., Gobbetti, M., Kleerebezem, M., Lemos, J. A., Linares, D. M., Ross, P., Stanton, C., et al. (2016) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00076-15 · Cited by 914
Nomenclature for Macrolide and Macrolide-Lincosamide-Streptogramin B Resistance Determinants
Roberts, M. C., Sutcliffe, J., Courvalin, P., Jensen, L. B., Rood, J., & Seppala, H. (1999) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.43.12.2823 · Cited by 874
Insights into the Interaction between Influenza Virus and Pneumococcus
McCullers, J. A. (2006) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00058-05 · Cited by 846
Metadata
- Venue
- ASM Press eBooks
- Publisher
- ASM Press
- Published
- 2019-10-01
- OpenAlex
- W1508801011
- Cited by
- 1,009
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gram-Positive Pathogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/9781683670131
- The paper
- Gram-Positive Pathogens. (2019). ASM Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1128/9781683670131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.