The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Affinity of Ceftaroline and Other β-Lactams for Penicillin-Binding Proteins from Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae
Open accessAbstract
We compared the affinities of ceftaroline for all penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) with those of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in 6 Staphylococcus aureus and 7 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates with various resistance phenotypes. Ceftaroline MICs were ≤1 μg/ml against all S. aureus isolates and were ≤0.25 μg/ml for 4 of 7 isolates of S. pneumoniae . Ceftaroline affinities for penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae strains were in the order PBP2X and -3 > PBP1A, -1B, and -2A > PBP2B, and ceftaroline had ≥4-fold higher 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC 50 s) (0.1 to 4 μg/ml) for PBP2X, -2A, -2B, and -3 than those for the other cephalosporins tested. Among 3 penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains, ceftaroline had a high affinity for PBP2X (IC 50 , 0.1 to 1 μg/ml), a primary target for cephalosporin PBP binding activity, and high affinities for PBP2B (IC 50 , 0.5 to 4 μg/ml) and PBP1A (IC 50 , 0.125 to 0.25 μg/ml) as well, both of which are also known as major targets for PBP binding activity of cephalosporins. Ceftaroline PBP affinities in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strains were greater than or equal to those of the 3 other β-lactams tested. Ceftaroline bound to PBP2a in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (IC 50 , 0.01 to 1 μg/ml) with up to 256-fold-higher affinity than those of other agents. Ceftaroline demonstrated very good PBP affinity against all S. aureus and S. pneumoniae strains tested, including resistant isolates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanisms of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Peacock, S. J., & Paterson, G. K. (2015) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034516 · Cited by 656
Combating Multidrug‐Resistant Bacteria: Current Strategies for the Discovery of Novel Antibacterials
O'Connell, K. M. G., Hodgkinson, J. T., Sore, H. F., Welch, M., Salmond, G. P. C., & Spring, D. R. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201209979 · Cited by 435
Penicillin‐binding protein 2a of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Fishovitz, J., Hermoso, J. A., Chang, M., & Mobashery, S. (2014) · IUBMB Life · doi:10.1002/iub.1289 · Cited by 279
Lin, J. C., Fierer, J., Aung, G., Johns, S., Thomas, A., Jahng, M., Fierer, J., & Fierer, J. (2013) · Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1007/s10156-012-0449-9 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Kosowska-Shick, K., McGhee, P. L., & Appelbaum, P. C.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1670-1677
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2069153240
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Affinity of Ceftaroline and Other β-Lactams for Penicillin-Binding Proteins from Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.00019-10
- The paper
- Kosowska-Shick, K., McGhee, P. L., & Appelbaum, P. C. (2010). Affinity of Ceftaroline and Other β-Lactams for Penicillin-Binding Proteins from Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00019-10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.