Cited by 41Ocular Infections and TreatmentsAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy

Intraocular penetration of intravenous micafungin in inflamed human eyes

Open access
Mochizuki, Kiyofumi, Sawada, Akira, Suemori, Shinsuke, Kawakami, Hideaki, Niwa, Yoshiaki, Kondo, Yuji, Ohkusu, Kiyofumi, Yamada, Noriaki +4 more·2013·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Eight eyes of 7 patients with fungal disease received intravenous injections of 150 to 300 mg micafungin, and samples of blood, cornea, retina-choroid, aqueous humor, and vitreous humor were collected. The micafungin levels in all collected samples exceeded the MICs; however, the levels in the vitreous and aqueous humors were lower. Our findings suggest that intravenous micafungin should be given in combination with intravitreal antifungal agents after vitrectomy in severe cases of intraocular fungal diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.02300-12

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For fluconazole-resistant isolates, liposomal amphotericin B is preferred over echinocandins, which achieve suboptimal vitreous concentrations.

    “For fluconazole-resistant isolates, liposomal amphotericin B is preferred over echinocandins, which achieve suboptimal vitreous concentrations [109,110].”

    From Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis: A Narrative Review (2018) · cites this paper as [109]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mochizuki, K., Sawada, A., Suemori, S., Kawakami, H., Niwa, Y., Kondo, Y., Ohkusu, K., Yamada, N., Ogura, S., Yaguchi, T., Nishimura, K., & Kishino, S.
Affiliations
  • Gifu University (JP)
  • Gifu Municipal Hospital (JP)
  • Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center (JP)
  • Chuno Kosei Hospital (JP)
  • Chiba University (JP)
  • Dokkyo Medical University (JP)
  • Meiji Pharmaceutical University (JP)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2013-08
Volume
57
Issue
8
Pages
4027-4030
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W1969014414
Cited by
41
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Keywords
micafungin, intraocular penetration, intravenous administration, vitreous humor, aqueous humor, cornea, vitrectomy
MeSH terms
Micafungin, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antifungal Agents, Aqueous Humor, Aspergillus, Candida, Cornea, Female, Humans, Male, Endophthalmitis, Vitrectomy, Vitreous Body, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides, Injections, Intraocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review