The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment Outcome of Bacteremia Due to KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: Superiority of Combination Antimicrobial Regimens
Open accessAbstract
Klebsiella pneumoniae producing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) has been associated with serious infections and high mortality. The optimal antimicrobial therapy for infection due to KPC-producing K. pneumoniae is not well established. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with bacteremia caused by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae . A total of 41 unique patients with blood cultures growing KPC-producing K. pneumoniae were identified at two medical centers in the United States. Most of the infections were hospital acquired (32; 78%), while the rest of the cases were health care associated (9; 22%). The overall 28-day crude mortality rate was 39.0% (16/41). In the multivariate analysis, definitive therapy with a combination regimen was independently associated with survival (odds ratio, 0.07 [95% confidence interval, 0.009 to 0.71], P = 0.02). The 28-day mortality was 13.3% in the combination therapy group compared with 57.8% in the monotherapy group ( P = 0.01). The most commonly used combinations were colistin-polymyxin B or tigecycline combined with a carbapenem. The mortality in this group was 12.5% (1/8). Despite in vitro susceptibility, patients who received monotherapy with colistin-polymyxin B or tigecycline had a higher mortality of 66.7% (8/12). The use of combination therapy for definitive therapy appears to be associated with improved survival in bacteremia due to KPC-producing K. pneumoniae .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Epidemiology and Prevention
Gupta, N., Limbago, B. M., Patel, J. B., & Kallen, A. J. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir202 · Cited by 1,033
Cited by
Treatment Options for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections
Morrill, H. J., Pogue, J. M., Kaye, K. S., & LaPlante, K. L. (2015) · Open Forum Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofv050 · Cited by 435
Thabit, A. K., Crandon, J. L., & Nicolau, D. P. (2015) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1517/14656566.2015.993381 · Cited by 160
Escalating antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae: Focus on carbapenemases
Lynch, J. P., Clark, N. M., & Zhanel, G. G. (2021) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1080/14656566.2021.1904891 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Qureshi, Z. A., Paterson, D. L., Potoski, B. A., Kilayko, M. C., Sandovsky, G., Sordillo, E., Polsky, B., Adams-Haduch, J. M., & Doi, Y.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2108-2113
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2166505398
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment Outcome of Bacteremia Due to KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: Superiority of Combination Antimicrobial Regimens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.06268-11
- The paper
- Qureshi, Z. A., Paterson, D. L., Potoski, B. A., Kilayko, M. C., Sandovsky, G., Sordillo, E., Polsky, B., Adams-Haduch, J. M., & Doi, Y. (2012). Treatment Outcome of Bacteremia Due to KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: Superiority of Combination Antimicrobial Regimens. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.06268-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.