The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In vitro and in vivo activities of clarithromycin against Mycobacterium avium
Open accessAbstract
There is no effective therapy to treat Mycobacterium avium complex infection in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Clarithromycin (A-56268; TE-031) is a new macrolide which is twofold more active than erythromycin against most aerobic bacteria. In addition, higher levels in serum and tissue are achieved with clarithromycin than with erythromycin. In this study, clarithromycin, erythromycin, difloxacin, temafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, rifampin, amikacin, and ethambutol were tested in vitro and in vivo against the M. avium complex. The MICs for 90% of strains tested were 4 micrograms/ml for clarithromycin, 64 micrograms/ml for erythromycin, 32 micrograms/ml for difloxacin, 8 micrograms/ml for temafloxacin, 4 micrograms/ml for ciprofloxacin, 4 micrograms/ml for rifampin, 32 micrograms/ml for amikacin, and 32 micrograms/ml for ethambutol. Beige mice were infected intravenously with 10(7) CFU of M. avium ATCC 25291. Treatment was started on day 6 after infection and was administered twice a day at 8-h intervals for 9 days. Clarithromycin was the most effective compound in these tests and was effective in reducing the viable bacterial counts in the spleen when it was administered subcutaneously or orally at a dose of 25 mg/kg. Amikacin was the only other compound which showed activity in vivo. The peak concentration in serum at which clarithromycin was active was approximately 1.0 microgram/ml.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Mycobacterium avium complex
Inderlied, C. B., Kemper, C. A., & Bermudez, L. E. (1993) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.6.3.266 · Cited by 687
Mycobacterial cell wall: Structure and role in natural resistance to antibiotics
Jarlier, V (1994) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1016/0378-1097(94)90267-4 · Cited by 593
Brown, B. A., Wallace, R. J., Onyi, G. O., De Rosas, V, & Wallace, R. J. (1992) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.36.1.180 · Cited by 301
Pierce, M., Crampton, S., Henry, D., Heifets, L., LaMarca, A., Montecalvo, M., Wormser, G. P., Jablonowski, H., Jemsek, J., Cynamon, M., et al. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199608083350603 · Cited by 294
ATP Synthase Inhibition of Mycobacterium avium Is Not Bactericidal
Lounis, N., Gevers, T., Van Den Berg, J., Vranckx, L., & Andries, K. (2009) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00689-09 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Fernandes, P. B., Hardy, D. J., McDaniel, D., Hanson, C. W., & Swanson, R. N.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1531-1534
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2053280641
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vitro and in vivo activities of clarithromycin against Mycobacterium avium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.33.9.1531
- The paper
- Fernandes, P. B., Hardy, D. J., McDaniel, D., Hanson, C. W., & Swanson, R. N. (1989). In vitro and in vivo activities of clarithromycin against Mycobacterium avium. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.33.9.1531
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.