Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 628

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bacterial resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin antibiotics by target modification

Open access
Leclercq, R, Courvalin, P·1991·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Introduction.Macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin (MLS) antibiotics are chemically distinct but have a similar mode of action.They have a narrow spectrum of activity that includes gram-positive cocci (in particular, staphylo- cocci, streptococci, and enterococci) and bacilli and gram- negative cocci.These drugs, especially clindamycin, are also potent against anaerobic bacteria.Gram-negative bacilli are usually resistant to MLS antibiotics, but certain enteric bacilli and Haemophilus spp.are susceptible to azithromy- cin in vitro.However, the activities of these antibiotics against Campylobacter, Legionella, and Chlamydia spp.are at the origin of the recent renaissance of erythromycin.Macrolides are composed of a minimum of two amino and/or neutral sugars attached to a lactone ring of variable size.Macrolides commercially available or in clinical devel- opment can be divided into 14-, 15-, and 16-membered lactone ring macrolides.These classes differ in their phar- macokinetic properties and in their responses to bacterial resistance mechanisms.Lincosamides (lincomycin and the more active semisynthetic derivative clindamycin) are alkyl derivatives of proline and are devoid of a lactone ring.Streptogramin antibiotics are used in clinical practice in certain countries, including Belgium and France.They are composed of two factors, A and B (II and I in pristinamycin and M and S in virginiamycin, respectively), that act in synergy and are produced by the same microorganism.In 1956, a few years after the introduction of erythromycin in therapy, resistance of staphylococci to this drug emerged and subsequently spread in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (13,22,37).The MLS cross-resistance phenotype due to modification of the drug target is widely distributed and has, since then, been detected in Staphylo- coccus spp.(41, 72), Streptococcus spp.(18, 23, 30), Entero- coccus spp.(16), Corynebacterium diptheriae (17), Bacteroides spp.(61, 65), Clostridium spp.(64, 79), Bacillus spp.(47, 48), Lactobacillus spp.(5, 57), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (69), Campylobacter spp.(11) and, recently, Propionibacte- rium spp.(20) and members of the family Enterobac- teriaceae (1).This paper reviews the biochemical mechanism and the genetic basis of resistance to MLS antibiotics in human pathogens by target modification.Biochemical mechanism.Clinical isolates resistant to erythromycin synthesize an enzyme that N6 dimethylates an adenine residue in 23S rRNA (40).The precise site of

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.35.7.1267

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 628

Metadata

Authors
Leclercq, R., & Courvalin, P.
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
1991-07
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
1267-1272
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W1988907123
Cited by
628
References
0
FWCI
6.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin antibiotics by target modification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.35.7.1267
The paper
Leclercq, R., & Courvalin, P. (1991). Bacterial resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin antibiotics by target modification. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.35.7.1267

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.