The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Salt-Resistant Alpha-Helical Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides
Open accessAbstract
Analogues based on the insect cecropin–bee melittin hybrid peptide (CEME) were studied and analyzed for activity and salt resistance. The new variants were designed to have an increase in amphipathic α-helical content (CP29 and CP26) and in overall positive charge (CP26). The α-helicity of these peptides was demonstrated by circular dichroism spectroscopy in the presence of liposomes. CP29 was shown to have activity against gram-negative bacteria that was similar to or better than those of the parent peptides, and CP26 had similar activity. CP29 had cytoplasmic membrane permeabilization activity, as assessed by the unmasking of cytoplasmic β-galactosidase, similar to that of CEME and its more positively charged derivative named CEMA, whereas CP26 was substantially less effective. The activity of the peptides was not greatly attenuated by an uncoupler of membrane potential, carbonyl cyanide- m -chlorophenylhydrazone. The tryptophan residue in position 2 was shown to be necessary for interaction with cell membranes, as demonstrated by a complete lack of activity in the peptide CP208. Peptides CP29, CEME, and CEMA were resistant to antagonism by 0.1 to 0.3 M NaCl; however, CP26 was resistant to antagonism only by up to 160 mM NaCl. The peptides were generally more antagonized by 3 and 5 mM Mg 2+ and by the polyanion alginate. It appeared that the positively charged C terminus in CP26 altered its ability to permeabilize the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli , although CP26 maintained its ability to kill gram-negative bacteria. These peptides are potential candidates for future therapeutic drugs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Peptide Action and Resistance
Yeaman, M. R., & Yount, N. Y. (2003) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.55.1.2 · Cited by 3,001
Bahar, A., & Ren, D. (2013) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph6121543 · Cited by 1,351
Amphipathic, α-helical antimicrobial peptides
Tossi, A., Sandri, L., & Giangaspero, A. (2000) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/1097-0282(2000)55:1<4::aid-bip30>3.0.co;2-m · Cited by 1,247
Antibacterial peptides for therapeutic use: obstacles and realistic outlook
MARR, A., GOODERHAM, W., & HANCOCK, R. (2006) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2006.04.006 · Cited by 1,051
Self-citationAntimicrobial peptides: an overview of a promising class of therapeutics
Giuliani, A., Pirri, G., & Nicoletto, S. (2007) · Open Life Sciences · doi:10.2478/s11535-007-0010-5 · Cited by 606
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedrich, C., Scott, M. G., Karunaratne, N., Yan, H., & Hancock, R. E. W.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1542-1548
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2111584103
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Salt-Resistant Alpha-Helical Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.43.7.1542
- The paper
- Friedrich, C., Scott, M. G., Karunaratne, N., Yan, H., & Hancock, R. E. W. (1999). Salt-Resistant Alpha-Helical Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.43.7.1542
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.