The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mutations in 23S rRNA and Ribosomal Protein L4 Account for Resistance in Pneumococcal Strains Selected In Vitro by Macrolide Passage
Open accessAbstract
The mechanisms responsible for macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae mutants, selected from susceptible strains by serial passage in azithromycin, were investigated. These mutants were resistant to 14- and 15-membered macrolides, but resistance could not be explained by any clinically relevant resistance determinant [ mef (A), erm (A), erm (B), erm (C), erm (TR), msr (A), mph (A), mph (B), mph (C), ere (A), ere (B)]. An investigation into the sequences of 23S rRNAs in the mutant and parental strains revealed individual changes of C2611A, C2611G, A2058G, and A2059G ( Escherichia coli numbering) in four mutants. Mutations at these residues in domain V of 23S rRNA have been noted to confer erythromycin resistance in other species. Not all four 23S rRNA alleles have to contain the mutation to confer resistance. Some of the mutations also confer coresistance to streptogramin B (C2611A, C2611G, and A2058G), 16-membered macrolides (all changes), and clindamycin (A2058G and A2059G). Interestingly, none of these mutations confer high-level resistance to telithromycin (HMR-3647). Further, two of the mutants which had no changes in their 23S rRNA sequences had changes in a highly conserved stretch of amino acids ( 63 KPWRQKGTGRAR 74 ) in ribosomal protein L4. One mutant contained a single amino acid change (G69C), while the other mutant had a 6-base insert, resulting in two amino acids (S and Q) being inserted between amino acids Q67 and K68. To our knowledge, this is the first description of mutations in 23S rRNA genes or ribosomal proteins in macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae strains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Erythromycin inhibits the assembly of the large ribosomal subunit in growing Escherichia coli cells
Chittum, H. S., & Champney, W. S. (1995) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf00295501 · Cited by 88
Cited by
The bacterial ribosome as a target for antibiotics
Poehlsgaard, J., & Douthwaite, S. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1265 · Cited by 607
Antimicrobial Treatment Guidelines for Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis
Partnership, S. A. A. H. (2004) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2003.12.003 · Cited by 535
Multi-targeting by monotherapeutic antibacterials
Silver, L. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2202 · Cited by 311
Translation and Protein Synthesis: Macrolides
Katz, L., & Ashley, G. W. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030107f · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Tait-Kamradt, A., Davies, T., Cronan, M., Jacobs, M. R., Appelbaum, P. C., & Sutcliffe, J.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2118-2125
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2144857212
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutations in 23S rRNA and Ribosomal Protein L4 Account for Resistance in Pneumococcal Strains Selected In Vitro by Macrolide Passage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.44.8.2118-2125.2000
- The paper
- Tait-Kamradt, A., Davies, T., Cronan, M., Jacobs, M. R., Appelbaum, P. C., & Sutcliffe, J. (2000). Mutations in 23S rRNA and Ribosomal Protein L4 Account for Resistance in Pneumococcal Strains Selected In Vitro by Macrolide Passage. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.44.8.2118-2125.2000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.