Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Posaconazole in Patients with Persistent Febrile Neutropenia or Refractory Invasive Fungal Infection

Open access
Ullmann, A. J., Cornely, O. A., Burchardt, A., Hachem, R., Kontoyiannis, D. P., Töpelt, K., Courtney, R., Wexler, D., Krishna, G., Martinho, M., Corcoran, G., Raad, I.·2006·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic profiles, safety, and efficacies of different dosing schedules of posaconazole oral suspension in patients with possible, probable, and proven refractory invasive fungal infection (rIFI) or febrile neutropenia (FN) were evaluated in a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group study. Sixty-six patients with FN and 32 patients with rIFI were randomly assigned to one of three posaconazole regimens: 200 mg four times a day (q.i.d.) for nine doses, followed by 400 mg twice a day (b.i.d.); 400 mg q.i.d. for nine doses, followed by 600 mg b.i.d.; or 800 mg b.i.d. for five doses, followed by 800 mg once a day (q.d.). Therapy was continued for up to 6 months in patients with rIFI or until neutrophil recovery occurred in patients with FN. The 400-mg-b.i.d. dose provided the highest overall mean exposure, with 135% ( P = 0.0004) and 182% ( P < 0.0001) greater exposure than the 600-mg-b.i.d. and 800-mg-q.d. doses, respectively. However, exposure in allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients ( n = 12) was 52% lower than in non-BMT patients. Treatment-related adverse events (occurring in 24% of patients) were mostly gastrointestinal in nature. Twenty-four percent of patients had adverse events leading to premature discontinuation (none were treatment related). In efficacy-evaluable patients, successful clinical response was observed in 43% with rIFI (56% of patients receiving 400 mg b.i.d., 17% receiving 600 mg b.i.d., and 50% receiving 800 mg q.d.) and 77% with FN (74% receiving 400 mg b.i.d., 78% receiving 600 mg b.i.d., and 81% receiving 800 mg q.d.). Posaconazole is well tolerated and absorbed. Divided doses of 800 mg (400 mg b.i.d.) provide the greatest posaconazole exposure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.50.2.658-666.2006

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Ullmann, A. J., Cornely, O. A., Burchardt, A., Hachem, R., Kontoyiannis, D. P., Töpelt, K., Courtney, R., Wexler, D., Krishna, G., Martinho, M., Corcoran, G., & Raad, I.
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2006-02
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
658-666
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2142996250
Cited by
273
References
4
FWCI
19.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Posaconazole in Patients with Persistent Febrile Neutropenia or Refractory Invasive Fungal Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.50.2.658-666.2006
The paper
Ullmann, A. J., Cornely, O. A., Burchardt, A., Hachem, R., Kontoyiannis, D. P., Töpelt, K., Courtney, R., Wexler, D., Krishna, G., Martinho, M., Corcoran, G., & Raad, I. (2006). Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Posaconazole in Patients with Persistent Febrile Neutropenia or Refractory Invasive Fungal Infection. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.50.2.658-666.2006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.