The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenetic Comparison of the Methanogenic Communities from an Acidic, Oligotrophic Fen and an Anaerobic Digester Treating Municipal Wastewater Sludge
Open accessAbstract
Methanogens play a critical role in the decomposition of organics under anaerobic conditions. The methanogenic consortia in saturated wetland soils are often subjected to large temperature fluctuations and acidic conditions, imposing a selective pressure for psychro- and acidotolerant community members; however, methanogenic communities in engineered digesters are frequently maintained within a narrow range of mesophilic and circumneutral conditions to retain system stability. To investigate the hypothesis that these two disparate environments have distinct methanogenic communities, the methanogens in an oligotrophic acidic fen and a mesophilic anaerobic digester treating municipal wastewater sludge were characterized by creating clone libraries for the 16S rRNA and methyl coenzyme M reductase alpha subunit ( mcrA ) genes. A quantitative framework was developed to assess the differences between these two communities by calculating the average sequence similarity for 16S rRNA genes and mcrA within a genus and family using sequences of isolated and characterized methanogens within the approved methanogen taxonomy. The average sequence similarities for 16S rRNA genes within a genus and family were 96.0 and 93.5%, respectively, and the average sequence similarities for mcrA within a genus and family were 88.9 and 79%, respectively. The clone libraries of the bog and digester environments showed no overlap at the species level and almost no overlap at the family level. Both libraries were dominated by clones related to uncultured methanogen groups within the Methanomicrobiales , although members of the Methanosarcinales and Methanobacteriales were also found in both libraries. Diversity indices for the 16S rRNA gene library of the bog and both mcrA libraries were similar, but these indices indicated much lower diversity in the 16S digester library than in the other three libraries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment
Kumar, S. (2004) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/5.2.150 · Cited by 11,756
STACKEBRANDT, E., & GOEBEL, B. M. (1994) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-44-4-846 · Cited by 7,083
Archaea in coastal marine environments.
DeLong, E. F. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.12.5685 · Cited by 2,725
Schloss, P. D., & Handelsman, J. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.3.1501-1506.2005 · Cited by 2,501
Counting the Uncountable: Statistical Approaches to Estimating Microbial Diversity
Hughes, J. B., Hellmann, J. J., Ricketts, T. H., & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.10.4399-4406.2001 · Cited by 1,296
Taxonomic, Phylogenetic, and Ecological Diversity of Methanogenic Archaea
Garcia, J.-L., Patel, B. K. C., & Ollivier, B. (2000) · Anaerobe · doi:10.1006/anae.2000.0345 · Cited by 875
Luton, P. E., Wayne, J. M., Sharp, R. J., & Riley, P. W. (2002) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-148-11-3521 · Cited by 874
Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes to describe natural communities of methanogens
Raskin, L., Stromley, J. M., Rittmann, B. E., & Stahl, D. A. (1994) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.60.4.1232-1240.1994 · Cited by 869
Whitman, W. B., Bowen, T. L., & Boone, D. R. (2006) · The Prokaryotes · doi:10.1007/0-387-30743-5_9 · Cited by 535
Challenge of psychrophilic anaerobic wastewater treatment
Lettinga, G. (2001) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0167-7799(01)01701-2 · Cited by 499
Cited by
Rubino, F., Carberry, C., Waters, S. M., Kenny, D., McCabe, M. S., & Creevey, C. J. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.172 · Cited by 101
Purkamo, L., Kietäväinen, R., Nuppunen-Puputti, M., Bomberg, M., & Cousins, C. (2020) · Life · doi:10.3390/life10010002 · Cited by 55
Duller, S., Vrbancic, S., Szydłowski, Ł., Mahnert, A., Blohs, M., Predl, M., Kumpitsch, C., Zrim, V., Högenauer, C., Kosciolek, T., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52037-7 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Steinberg, L. M., & Regan, J. M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 6663-6671
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2097060300
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 18.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic Comparison of the Methanogenic Communities from an Acidic, Oligotrophic Fen and an Anaerobic Digester Treating Municipal Wastewater Sludge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.00553-08
- The paper
- Steinberg, L. M., & Regan, J. M. (2008). Phylogenetic Comparison of the Methanogenic Communities from an Acidic, Oligotrophic Fen and an Anaerobic Digester Treating Municipal Wastewater Sludge. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00553-08
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.