The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversity and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Sphingomonadaceae Isolates from Drinking Water
Open accessAbstract
Sphingomonadaceae(n= 86) were isolated from a drinking water treatment plant (n= 6), tap water (n= 55), cup fillers for dental chairs (n= 21), and a water demineralization filter (n= 4). The bacterial isolates were identified based on analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence, and intraspecies variation was assessed on the basis of atpD gene sequence analysis. The isolates were identified as members of the genera Sphingomonas(n= 27),Sphingobium(n= 28),Novosphingobium(n= 12),Sphingopyxis(n= 7), and Blastomonas(n= 12). The patterns of susceptibility to five classes of antibiotics were analyzed and compared for the different sites of isolation and taxonomic groups. Colistin resistance was observed to be intrinsic (92%). The highest antibiotic resistance prevalence values were observed in members of the genera Sphingomonas and Sphingobium and for beta-lactams, ciprofloxacin, and cotrimoxazole. In tap water and in water from dental chairs, antibiotic resistance was more prevalent than in the other samples, mainly due to the predominance of isolates of the genera Sphingomonas and Sphingobium. These two genera presented distinct patterns of association with antibiotic resistance, suggesting different paths of resistance development. Antibiotic resistance patterns were often related to the species rather than to the site or strain, suggesting the importance of vertical resistance transmission in these bacteria. This is the first study demonstrating that members of the family Sphingomonadaceae are potential reservoirs of antibiotic resistance in drinking water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Cited by
Environmental Factors Support the Formation of Specific Bacterial Assemblages on Microplastics
Oberbeckmann, S., Kreikemeyer, B., & Labrenz, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02709 · Cited by 549
Vaz-Moreira, I., Nunes, O. C., & Manaia, C. M. (2014) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12062 · Cited by 364
Self-citationCantas, L., Shah, S. Q. A., Cavaco, L. M., Manaia, C. M., Walsh, F., Popowska, M., Garelick, H., Bürgmann, H., & Sørum, H. (2013) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00096 · Cited by 357
Self-citationMyles, I. A., Castillo, C. R., Barbian, K. D., Kanakabandi, K., Virtaneva, K., Fitzmeyer, E., Paneru, M., Otaizo-Carrasquero, F., Myers, T. G., Markowitz, T. E., et al. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz8631 · Cited by 139
Metagenomic analysis of soil microbial community under PFOA and PFOS stress
Cai, Y., Chen, H., Yuan, R., Wang, F., Chen, Z., & Zhou, B. (2020) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109838 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaz-Moreira, I., Nunes, O. C., & Manaia, C. M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2011-08-15
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 5697-5706
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2168369357
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Sphingomonadaceae Isolates from Drinking Water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.00579-11
- The paper
- Vaz-Moreira, I., Nunes, O. C., & Manaia, C. M. (2011). Diversity and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Sphingomonadaceae Isolates from Drinking Water. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00579-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.