The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cold Atmospheric Air Plasma Sterilization against Spores and Other Microorganisms of Clinical Interest
Open accessAbstract
Physical cold atmospheric surface microdischarge (SMD) plasma operating in ambient air has promising properties for the sterilization of sensitive medical devices where conventional methods are not applicable. Furthermore, SMD plasma could revolutionize the field of disinfection at health care facilities. The antimicrobial effects on Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria of clinical relevance, as well as the fungus Candida albicans , were tested. Thirty seconds of plasma treatment led to a 4 to 6 log 10 CFU reduction on agar plates. C. albicans was the hardest to inactivate. The sterilizing effect on standard bioindicators (bacterial endospores) was evaluated on dry test specimens that were wrapped in Tyvek coupons. The experimental D 23 ° C values for Bacillus subtilis , Bacillus pumilus , Bacillus atrophaeus , and Geobacillus stearothermophilus were determined as 0.3 min, 0.5 min, 0.6 min, and 0.9 min, respectively. These decimal reduction times ( D values) are distinctly lower than D values obtained with other reference methods. Importantly, the high inactivation rate was independent of the material of the test specimen. Possible inactivation mechanisms for relevant microorganisms are briefly discussed, emphasizing the important role of neutral reactive plasma species and pointing to recent diagnostic methods that will contribute to a better understanding of the strong biocidal effect of SMD air plasma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Athanasiou, K. A., Niederauer, G. G., & Agrawal, C. M. (1996) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/0142-9612(96)85754-1 · Cited by 1,497
Cited by
Ziuzina, D., Patil, S., Cullen, P. J., Keener, K. M., & Bourke, P. (2014) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2014.02.007 · Cited by 441
Han, L., Patil, S., Boehm, D., Milosavljević, V., Cullen, P. J., & Bourke, P. (2016) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02660-15 · Cited by 435
Sakudo, A., Yagyu, Y., & Onodera, T. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20205216 · Cited by 341
Min, S. C., Roh, S. H., Niemira, B. A., Sites, J. E., Boyd, G., & Lacombe, A. (2016) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.08.025 · Cited by 145
Tavares, M. B., Souza, R. D., Luiz, W. B., Cavalcante, R. C. M., Casaroli, C., Martins, E. G., Ferreira, R. C. C., & Ferreira, L. C. S. (2013) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00284-012-0269-2 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Klämpfl, T. G., Isbary, G., Shimizu, T., Li, Y.-F., Zimmermann, J. L., Stolz, W., Schlegel, J., Morfill, G. E., & Schmidt, H.-U.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 5077-5082
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2095070917
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cold Atmospheric Air Plasma Sterilization against Spores and Other Microorganisms of Clinical Interest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.00583-12
- The paper
- Klämpfl, T. G., Isbary, G., Shimizu, T., Li, Y.-F., Zimmermann, J. L., Stolz, W., Schlegel, J., Morfill, G. E., & Schmidt, H.-U. (2012). Cold Atmospheric Air Plasma Sterilization against Spores and Other Microorganisms of Clinical Interest. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00583-12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.