The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanism of Copper Surface Toxicity in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci following Wet or Dry Surface Contact
Open accessAbstract
Contaminated touch surfaces have been implicated in the spread of hospital-acquired infections, and the use of biocidal surfaces could help to reduce this cross-contamination. In a previous study we reported the death of aqueous inocula of pathogenic Enterococcus faecalis or Enterococcus faecium isolates, simulating fomite surface contamination, in 1 h on copper alloys, compared to survival for months on stainless steel. In our current study we observed an even faster kill of over a 6-log reduction of viable enterococci in less than 10 min on copper alloys with a “dry” inoculum equivalent to touch contamination. We investigated the effect of copper(I) and copper(II) chelation and the quenching of reactive oxygen species on cell viability assessed by culture and their effects on genomic DNA, membrane potential, and respiration in situ on metal surfaces. We propose that copper surface toxicity for enterococci involves the direct or indirect action of released copper ionic species and the generation of superoxide, resulting in arrested respiration and DNA breakdown as the first stages of cell death. The generation of hydroxyl radicals by the Fenton reaction does not appear to be the dominant instrument of DNA damage. The bacterial membrane potential is unaffected in the early stages of wet and dry surface contact, suggesting that the membrane is not compromised until after cell death. These results also highlight the importance of correct surface cleaning protocols to perpetuate copper ion release and prevent the chelation of ions by contaminants, which could reduce the efficacy of the surface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Noyce, J. O., Michels, H., & Keevil, C. W. (2006) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2005.12.008 · Cited by 403
Self-citationIntracellular Copper Does Not Catalyze the Formation of Oxidative DNA Damage in Escherichia coli
Macomber, L., Rensing, C., & Imlay, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.01357-06 · Cited by 356
Baker, J., Sitthisak, S., Sengupta, M., Johnson, M., Jayaswal, R. K., & Morrissey, J. A. (2010) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02268-09 · Cited by 163
Cited by
Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications
Lemire, J. A., Harrison, J. J., & Turner, R. J. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3028 · Cited by 2,746
Antimicrobial applications of copper
Vincent, M., Hartemann, P., & Engels-Deutsch, M. (2016) · International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.06.003 · Cited by 384
Antimicrobial Copper-Based Materials and Coatings: Potential Multifaceted Biomedical Applications
Mitra, D., Kang, E.-T., & Neoh, K. G. (2020) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.9b17815 · Cited by 322
Antimicrobial metallic copper surfaces kill Staphylococcus haemolyticus via membrane damage
Santo, C. E., Quaranta, D., & Grass, G. (2012) · MicrobiologyOpen · doi:10.1002/mbo3.2 · Cited by 195
Zhang, R., Jiang, G., Gao, Q., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Xu, X., Yan, W., & Shen, H. (2021) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/d1nr04687j · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Warnes, S. L., & Keevil, C. W.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6049-6059
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2095844371
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanism of Copper Surface Toxicity in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci following Wet or Dry Surface Contact. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.00597-11
- The paper
- Warnes, S. L., & Keevil, C. W. (2011). Mechanism of Copper Surface Toxicity in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci following Wet or Dry Surface Contact. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00597-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.