The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenetic Ecology of the Freshwater Actinobacteria acI Lineage
Open accessAbstract
The acI lineage of freshwater Actinobacteria is a cosmopolitan and often numerically dominant member of lake bacterial communities. We conducted a survey of acI 16S rRNA genes and 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer regions from 18 Wisconsin lakes and used standard nonphylogenetic and phylogenetic statistical approaches to investigate the factors that determine acI community composition at the local scale (within lakes) and at the regional scale (across lakes). Phylogenetic reconstruction of 434 acI 16S rRNA genes revealed a well-defined and highly resolved phylogeny. Eleven previously unrecognized monophyletic clades, each with ≥97.9% within-clade 16S rRNA gene sequence identity, were identified. Clade community similarity positively correlated with lake environmental similarity but not with geographic distance, implying that the lakes represent a single biotic region containing environmental filters for communities that have similar compositions. Phylogenetically disparate clades within the acI lineage were most abundant at the regional scale, and local communities were comprised of more closely related clades. Lake pH was a strong predictor of the community composition, but only when lakes with a pH below 6 were included in the data set. In the remaining lakes (pH above 6) biogeographic patterns in the landscape were instead a predictor of the observed acI community structure. The nonrandom distribution of the newly defined acI clades suggests potential ecophysiological differences between the clades, with acI clades AI, BII, and BIII preferring acidic lakes and acI clades AII, AVI, and BI preferring more alkaline lakes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
Cited by
The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology
Cavender‐Bares, J., Kozak, K. H., Fine, P. V. A., & Kembel, S. W. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x · Cited by 2,321
Jones, R. T., Robeson, M. S., Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2009) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.127 · Cited by 1,230
Accurate and complete genomes from metagenomes
Chen, L.-X., Anantharaman, K., Shaiber, A., Eren, A. M., & Banfield, J. F. (2020) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.258640.119 · Cited by 401
Metagenomics uncovers a new group of low GC and ultra-small marine Actinobacteria
Ghai, R., Mizuno, C. M., Picazo, A., Camacho, A., & Rodriguez-Valera, F. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02471 · Cited by 224
Treeshrews (Scandentia): an integrative review of taxonomy, ecology, evolution, and conservation
Togattiwar, A. S., Veeradharsan, A., & Kamalakannan, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2026.1799888
Metadata
- Authors
- Newton, R. J., Jones, S. E., Helmus, M. R., & McMahon, K. D.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2007-11-15
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 7169-7176
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2155881177
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic Ecology of the Freshwater Actinobacteria acI Lineage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.00794-07
- The paper
- Newton, R. J., Jones, S. E., Helmus, M. R., & McMahon, K. D. (2007). Phylogenetic Ecology of the Freshwater Actinobacteria acI Lineage. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00794-07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.