The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fungal Communities Associated with Degradation of Polyester Polyurethane in Soil
Open accessAbstract
Soil fungal communities involved in the biodegradation of polyester polyurethane (PU) were investigated. PU coupons were buried in two sandy loam soils with different levels of organic carbon: one was acidic (pH 5.5), and the other was more neutral (pH 6.7). After 5 months of burial, the fungal communities on the surface of the PU were compared with the native soil communities using culture-based and molecular techniques. Putative PU-degrading fungi were common in both soils, as <45% of the fungal colonies cleared the colloidal PU dispersion Impranil on solid medium. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis showed that fungal communities on the PU were less diverse than in the soil, and only a few species in the PU communities were detectable in the soil, indicating that only a small subset of the soil fungal communities colonized the PU. Soil type influenced the composition of the PU fungal communities. Geomyces pannorum and a Phoma sp. were the dominant species recovered by culturing from the PU buried in the acidic and neutral soils, respectively. Both fungi degraded Impranil and represented >80% of cultivable colonies from each plastic. However, PU was highly susceptible to degradation in both soils, losing up to 95% of its tensile strength. Therefore, different fungi are associated with PU degradation in different soils but the physical process is independent of soil type.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microbial degradation of polyurethane, polyester polyurethanes and polyether polyurethanes
Nakajima-Kambe, T., Shigeno-Akutsu, Y., Nomura, N., Onuma, F., & Nakahara, T. (1999) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s002530051373 · Cited by 284
Cited by
Early microbial biofilm formation on marine plastic debris
Lobelle, D., & Cunliffe, M. (2011) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.10.013 · Cited by 962
Plastic biodegradation: frontline microbes and their enzymes
Amobonye, A., Bhagwat, P., Singh, S., & Pillai, S. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143536 · Cited by 738
Dimensions of biodiversity in the Earth mycobiome
Peay, K. G., Kennedy, P. G., & Talbot, J. M. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.59 · Cited by 721
Microbial Degradation and Valorization of Plastic Wastes
Ru, J., Huo, Y., & Yang, Y. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00442 · Cited by 609
Biodegradation of Polyester Polyurethane by Endophytic Fungi
Russell, J. R., Huang, J., Anand, P., Kucera, K., Sandoval, A. G., Dantzler, K. W., Hickman, D., Jee, J., Kimovec, F. M., Koppstein, D., et al. (2011) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00521-11 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Cosgrove, L., McGeechan, P. L., Robson, G. D., & Handley, P. S.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2007-09-15
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 5817-5824
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2139482907
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fungal Communities Associated with Degradation of Polyester Polyurethane in Soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.01083-07
- The paper
- Cosgrove, L., McGeechan, P. L., Robson, G. D., & Handley, P. S. (2007). Fungal Communities Associated with Degradation of Polyester Polyurethane in Soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01083-07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.