The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dead or Alive: Molecular Assessment of Microbial Viability
Open accessAbstract
Nucleic acid-based analytical methods, ranging from species-targeted PCRs to metagenomics, have greatly expanded our understanding of microbiological diversity in natural samples. However, these methods provide only limited information on the activities and physiological states of microorganisms in samples. Even the most fundamental physiological state, viability, cannot be assessed cross-sectionally by standard DNA-targeted methods such as PCR. New PCR-based strategies, collectively called molecular viability analyses, have been developed that differentiate nucleic acids associated with viable cells from those associated with inactivated cells. In order to maximize the utility of these methods and to correctly interpret results, it is necessary to consider the physiological diversity of life and death in the microbial world. This article reviews molecular viability analysis in that context and discusses future opportunities for these strategies in genetic, metagenomic, and single-cell microbiology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042
McKenna, S. M., & Davies, K. J. A. (1988) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2540685 · Cited by 183
Cited by
Relic DNA is abundant in soil and obscures estimates of soil microbial diversity
Carini, P., Marsden, P. J., Leff, J. W., Morgan, E. E., Strickland, M. S., & Fierer, N. (2016) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.242 · Cited by 1,040
Culturing the human microbiota and culturomics
Lagier, J.-C., Dubourg, G., Million, M., Cadoret, F., Bilen, M., Fenollar, F., Levasseur, A., Rolain, J.-M., Fournier, P.-E., & Raoult, D. (2018) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-018-0041-0 · Cited by 872
The fecal metabolome as a functional readout of the gut microbiome
Zierer, J., Jackson, M. A., Kastenmüller, G., Mangino, M., Long, T., Telenti, A., Mohney, R. P., Small, K. S., Bell, J. T., Steves, C. J., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0135-7 · Cited by 733
Albertsen, M., Karst, S. M., Ziegler, A. S., Kirkegaard, R. H., & Nielsen, P. H. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132783 · Cited by 527
Innovative and rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems
van Belkum, A., Burnham, C.-A. D., Rossen, J. W. A., Mallard, F., Rochas, O., & Dunne, W. M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-020-0327-x · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Cangelosi, G. A., & Meschke, J. S.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 5884-5891
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2072544855
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dead or Alive: Molecular Assessment of Microbial Viability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.01763-14
- The paper
- Cangelosi, G. A., & Meschke, J. S. (2014). Dead or Alive: Molecular Assessment of Microbial Viability. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01763-14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.