Cited by 6Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Capillary Electrophoresis-Based Functional Genomics Screening to Discover Novel Archaeal DNA Modifying Enzymes

Open access
Zatopek, Kelly M., Fossa, Samantha L., Bilotti, Katharina, Caffrey, Paul J., Chuzel, Léa, Gehring, Alexandra M., Lohman, Gregory J. S., Taron, Christopher H., Gardner, Andrew F.·2022·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

This study provides a rapid, simple, high-throughput method to discover novel archaeal nucleic acid modifying enzymes by utilizing a fosmid genomic library, next-generation sequencing, and capillary electrophoresis. The method described here provides the details necessary to create 384-well fosmid library plates from Thermococcus kodakarensis genomic DNA, sequences of 384-well fosmids plates using Illumina next-generation sequencing, and performed high-throughput functional read-out assays using capillary electrophoresis to identify a variety of nucleic acid modifying activities, including DNA cleavage and ligation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.02137-21

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vivo rNMP incorporation events range from 200 to 2,200 or more per round of chromosomal replication in various bacterial species.

    “in vivo incorporation events range from 200 to 2,200 or more rNMPs per round of chromosomal replication in various bacterial species”

    From Ribonucleotide errors, RNase HII, and ribonucleotide excision repair (2026) · cites this paper as Zatopek et al. 2022

    The Results section on RNaseH2 describes cleavage of a ribonucleotide embedded in a DNA substrate, but gives no in vivo incorporation rate. Searches for the 200–2,200 range and for bacterial chromosomal replication frequencies found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed numbers or species comparison. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08491.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zatopek, K. M., Fossa, S. L., Bilotti, K., Caffrey, P. J., Chuzel, L., Gehring, A. M., Lohman, G. J. S., Taron, C. H., & Gardner, A. F.
Affiliations
New England Biolabs (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Gardner, Andrew F.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2022-01-25
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
e0213721-e0213721
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W3212220703
Cited by
6
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
New England Biolabs
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
DNA-modifying enzymes, Thermococcus kodakarensis, high-throughput functional screening, DNA endonuclease, AP lyase, enzyme discovery
MeSH terms
Escherichia coli, Electrophoresis, Capillary, DNA, Archaeal, Thermococcus, Archaeal Proteins, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review