The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Action of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles against Campylobacter jejuni
Open accessAbstract
The antibacterial effect of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles on Campylobacter jejuni was investigated for inhibition and inactivation of cell growth. The results showed that C. jejuni was extremely sensitive to treatment with ZnO nanoparticles. The MIC of ZnO nanoparticles for C. jejuni was determined to be 0.05 to 0.025 mg/ml, which is 8- to 16-fold lower than that for Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli O157:H7 (0.4 mg/ml). The action of ZnO nanoparticles against C. jejuni was determined to be bactericidal, not bacteriostatic. Scanning electron microscopy examination revealed that the majority of the cells transformed from spiral shapes into coccoid forms after exposure to 0.5 mg/ml of ZnO nanoparticles for 16 h, which is consistent with the morphological changes of C. jejuni under other stress conditions. These coccoid cells were found by ethidium monoazide-quantitative PCR (EMA-qPCR) to have a certain level of membrane leakage. To address the molecular basis of ZnO nanoparticle action, a large set of genes involved in cell stress response, motility, pathogenesis, and toxin production were selected for a gene expression study. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) showed that in response to treatment with ZnO nanoparticles, the expression levels of two oxidative stress genes ( katA and ahpC ) and a general stress response gene ( dnaK ) were increased 52-, 7-, and 17-fold, respectively. These results suggest that the antibacterial mechanism of ZnO nanoparticles is most likely due to disruption of the cell membrane and oxidative stress in Campylobacter .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860
Cited by
A review on ZnO nanostructured materials: energy, environmental and biological applications
Theerthagiri, J., Salla, S., Senthil, R. A., Nithyadharseni, P., Madankumar, A., Arunachalam, P., Maiyalagan, T., & Kim, H.-S. (2019) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/1361-6528/ab268a · Cited by 530
Zinc oxide nanoparticles for water disinfection
Dimapilis, E. A. S., Hsu, C.-S., Mendoza, R. M. O., & Lu, M.-C. (2018) · Sustainable Environment Research · doi:10.1016/j.serj.2017.10.001 · Cited by 426
Khezerlou, A., Alizadeh-Sani, M., Azizi-Lalabadi, M., & Ehsani, A. (2018) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2018.08.008 · Cited by 404
Ivask, A., Juganson, K., Bondarenko, O., Mortimer, M., Aruoja, V., Kasemets, K., Blinova, I., Heinlaan, M., Slaveykova, V., & Kahru, A. (2014) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2013.855831 · Cited by 332
ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles as novel antimicrobial agents for oral hygiene: a review
Khan, S. T., Al-Khedhairy, A. A., & Musarrat, J. (2015) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-015-3074-6 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Xie, Y., He, Y., Irwin, P. L., Jin, T., & Shi, X.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2325-2331
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2171251768
- Cited by
- 1,383
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Action of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles against Campylobacter jejuni. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.02149-10
- The paper
- Xie, Y., He, Y., Irwin, P. L., Jin, T., & Shi, X. (2011). Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Action of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles against Campylobacter jejuni. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02149-10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.