Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Co-Occurring Anammox, Denitrification, and Codenitrification in Agricultural Soils

Open access
Long, Andrew, Heitman, Joshua, Tobias, Craig, Philips, Rebecca, Song, Bongkeun·2013·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Anammox and denitrification mediated by bacteria are known to be the major microbial processes converting fixed N to N 2 gas in various ecosystems. Codenitrification and denitrification by fungi are additional pathways producing N 2 in soils. However, fungal codenitrification and denitrification have not been well investigated in agricultural soils. To evaluate bacterial and fungal processes contributing to N 2 production, molecular and 15 N isotope analyses were conducted with soil samples collected at six different agricultural fields in the United States. Denitrifying and anammox bacterial abundances were measured based on quantitative PCR (qPCR) of nitrous oxide reductase ( nosZ ) and hydrazine oxidase ( hzo ) genes, respectively, while the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of Fusarium oxysporum was quantified to estimate the abundance of codenitrifying and denitrifying fungi. 15 N tracer incubation experiments with 15 NO 3 − or 15 NH 4 + addition were conducted to measure the N 2 production rates from anammox, denitrification, and codenitrification. Soil incubation experiments with antibiotic treatments were also used to differentiate between fungal and bacterial N 2 production rates in soil samples. Denitrifying bacteria were found to be the most abundant, followed by F. oxysporum based on the qPCR assays. The potential denitrification rates by bacteria and fungi ranged from 4.118 to 42.121 nmol N 2 -N g −1 day −1 , while the combined potential rates of anammox and codenitrification ranged from 2.796 to 147.711 nmol N 2 -N g −1 day −1 . Soil incubation experiments with antibiotics indicated that fungal codenitrification was the primary process contributing to N 2 production in the North Carolina soil. This study clearly demonstrates the importance of fungal processes in the agricultural N cycle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.02520-12

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Long, A., Heitman, J., Tobias, C., Philips, R., & Song, B.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2013-01
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
168-176
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2027885045
Cited by
186
References
0
FWCI
19.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Co-Occurring Anammox, Denitrification, and Codenitrification in Agricultural Soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.02520-12
The paper
Long, A., Heitman, J., Tobias, C., Philips, R., & Song, B. (2013). Co-Occurring Anammox, Denitrification, and Codenitrification in Agricultural Soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02520-12

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.