Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Consumption of Methane and CO 2 by Methanotrophic Microbial Mats from Gas Seeps of the Anoxic Black Sea

Open access
Treude, Tina, Orphan, Victoria, Knittel, Katrin, Gieseke, Armin, House, Christopher H., Boetius, Antje·2007·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

The deep anoxic shelf of the northwestern Black Sea has numerous gas seeps, which are populated by methanotrophic microbial mats in and above the seafloor. Above the seafloor, the mats can form tall reef-like structures composed of porous carbonate and microbial biomass. Here, we investigated the spatial patterns of CH 4 and CO 2 assimilation in relation to the distribution of ANME groups and their associated bacteria in mat samples obtained from the surface of a large reef structure. A combination of different methods, including radiotracer incubation, beta microimaging, secondary ion mass spectrometry, and catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization, was applied to sections of mat obtained from the large reef structure to locate hot spots of methanotrophy and to identify the responsible microbial consortia. In addition, CO 2 reduction to methane was investigated in the presence or absence of methane, sulfate, and hydrogen. The mat had an average δ 13 C carbon isotopic signature of −67.1‰, indicating that methane was the main carbon source. Regions dominated by ANME-1 had isotope signatures that were significantly heavier (−66.4‰ ± 3.9 ‰ [mean ± standard deviation; n = 7]) than those of the more central regions dominated by ANME-2 (−72.9‰ ± 2.2 ‰; n = 7). Incorporation of 14 C from radiolabeled CH 4 or CO 2 revealed one hot spot for methanotrophy and CO 2 fixation close to the surface of the mat and a low assimilation efficiency (1 to 2% of methane oxidized). Replicate incubations of the mat with 14 CH 4 or 14 CO 2 revealed that there was interconversion of CH 4 and CO 2. The level of CO 2 reduction was about 10% of the level of anaerobic oxidation of methane. However, since considerable methane formation was observed only in the presence of methane and sulfate, the process appeared to be a rereaction of anaerobic oxidation of methane rather than net methanogenesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.02685-06

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Treude, T., Orphan, V., Knittel, K., Gieseke, A., House, C. H., & Boetius, A.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2007-04
Volume
73
Issue
7
Pages
2271-2283
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2172016346
Cited by
180
References
0
FWCI
13.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumption of Methane and CO 2 by Methanotrophic Microbial Mats from Gas Seeps of the Anoxic Black Sea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.02685-06
The paper
Treude, T., Orphan, V., Knittel, K., Gieseke, A., House, C. H., & Boetius, A. (2007). Consumption of Methane and CO 2 by Methanotrophic Microbial Mats from Gas Seeps of the Anoxic Black Sea. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02685-06

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.