The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacteria as Emerging Indicators of Soil Condition
Open accessAbstract
Bacterial communities are important for the health and productivity of soil ecosystems and have great potential as novel indicators of environmental perturbations. To assess how they are affected by anthropogenic activity and to determine their ability to provide alternative metrics of environmental health, we sought to define which soil variables bacteria respond to across multiple soil types and land uses. We determined, through 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, the composition of bacterial communities in soil samples from 110 natural or human-impacted sites, located up to 300 km apart. Overall, soil bacterial communities varied more in response to changing soil environments than in response to changes in climate or increasing geographic distance. We identified strong correlations between the relative abundances of members of Pirellulaceae and soil pH, members of Gaiellaceae and carbon-to-nitrogen ratios, members of Bradyrhizobium and the levels of Olsen P (a measure of plant available phosphorus), and members of Chitinophagaceae and aluminum concentrations. These relationships between specific soil attributes and individual soil taxa not only highlight ecological characteristics of these organisms but also demonstrate the ability of key bacterial taxonomic groups to reflect the impact of specific anthropogenic activities, even in comparisons of samples across large geographic areas and diverse soil types. Overall, we provide strong evidence that there is scope to use relative taxon abundances as biological indicators of soil condition. IMPORTANCE The impact of land use change and management on soil microbial community composition remains poorly understood. Therefore, we explored the relationship between a wide range of soil factors and soil bacterial community composition. We included variables related to anthropogenic activity and collected samples across a large spatial scale to interrogate the complex relationships between various bacterial community attributes and soil condition. We provide evidence of strong relationships between individual taxa and specific soil attributes even across large spatial scales and soil and land use types. Collectively, we were able to demonstrate the largely untapped potential of microorganisms to indicate the condition of soil and thereby influence the way that we monitor the effects of anthropogenic activity on soil ecosystems into the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST
Edgar, R. C. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 · Cited by 20,826
UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads
Edgar, R. C. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2604 · Cited by 16,707
Klindworth, A., Pruesse, E., Schweer, T., Peplies, J., Quast, C., Horn, M., & Glöckner, F. O. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks808 · Cited by 8,850
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
McDonald, D., Price, M. N., Goodrich, J., Nawrocki, E. P., DeSantis, T. Z., Probst, A., Andersen, G. L., Knight, R., & Hugenholtz, P. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.139 · Cited by 5,064
Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00335-09 · Cited by 4,063
Wuana, R. A., & Okieimen, F. E. (2011) · ISRN Ecology · doi:10.5402/2011/402647 · Cited by 3,822
Compant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clément, C., & Barka, E. A. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.9.4951-4959.2005 · Cited by 2,640
(2024) · LCC MAKS Press eBooks · doi:10.29003/m4174.978-5-317-07235-3 · Cited by 1,922
Fierer, N., Lauber, C. L., Ramirez, K. S., Zaneveld, J., Bradford, M. A., & Knight, R. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.159 · Cited by 1,866
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Lear G DopheideA Pierre-YvesA RobertsK WashingtonV SmithJ LewisGD. 2012. Biofilms in freshwater: their importance for the maintenance and monitoring of freshwater health, p 129–151. InMicrobial biofilms: current research and applications. Horizon Scientific Press, Norfolk, UK.
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.04.013 · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2010.04.013
- Curran-Cournane F . 2015. Soil quality state and trends in New Zealand's largest city after 15 years. Int J Environ Ecol Geol Geophys Eng9:227–234.
- Albuquerque L da CostaMS. 2014. The family Gaiellaceae, p 357–360. InRosenbergE DeLongEF LoryS StackebrandtE ThompsonF (ed), The prokaryotes. Springer, Berlin, Germany. · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30138-4_394
- 10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.025 · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.025
- 10.5897/AJMR2015.7453 · doi:10.5897/ajmr2015.7453
- 10.1038/256406a0 · doi:10.1038/256406a0
- Da Mota FF GomesEA MarrielIE PaivaE SeldinL. 2008. Bacterial and fungal communities in bulk soil and rhizospheres of aluminum-tolerant and aluminum-sensitive maize (Zea mays L.) lines cultivated in unlimed and limed cerrado soil. J Microbiol Biotechnol18:805–814.
- Auckland Regional Council. 2010. State of the Auckland region. Auckland Regional Council, Auckland, New Zealand.
- Hewitt AE . 2010. New Zealand soil classification, 3rd ed.Landcare Research Science Series No. 1. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, New Zealand.
- Hill RB SparlingGP. 2009. Soil quality monitoring. Land and soil monitoring: a guide for SoE and regional council reporting. Land Monitoring Forum, New Zealand.
- Clarke KR GorleyRN. 2015. PRIMER v7: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Cited by
Soil quality – A critical review
Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. E., De Deyn, G., de Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen, V., Kuyper, T. W., Mäder, P., et al. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030 · Cited by 2,960
How microbes can, and cannot, be used to assess soil health
Fierer, N., Wood, S. A., & Bueno de Mesquita, C. P. (2021) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108111 · Cited by 543
Buchman, J. T., Hudson-Smith, N. V., Landy, K. M., & Haynes, C. L. (2019) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00053 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Hermans, S. M., Buckley, H. L., Case, B. S., Curran-Cournane, F., Taylor, M., & Lear, G.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2544682192
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 15.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Licence
- journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacteria as Emerging Indicators of Soil Condition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.02826-16
- The paper
- Hermans, S. M., Buckley, H. L., Case, B. S., Curran-Cournane, F., Taylor, M., & Lear, G. (2017). Bacteria as Emerging Indicators of Soil Condition. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02826-16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.