Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bacteria as Emerging Indicators of Soil Condition

Open access
Hermans, Syrie M., Buckley, Hannah L., Case, Bradley S., Curran-Cournane, Fiona, Taylor, Matthew, Lear, Gavin·2017·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Bacterial communities are important for the health and productivity of soil ecosystems and have great potential as novel indicators of environmental perturbations. To assess how they are affected by anthropogenic activity and to determine their ability to provide alternative metrics of environmental health, we sought to define which soil variables bacteria respond to across multiple soil types and land uses. We determined, through 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, the composition of bacterial communities in soil samples from 110 natural or human-impacted sites, located up to 300 km apart. Overall, soil bacterial communities varied more in response to changing soil environments than in response to changes in climate or increasing geographic distance. We identified strong correlations between the relative abundances of members of Pirellulaceae and soil pH, members of Gaiellaceae and carbon-to-nitrogen ratios, members of Bradyrhizobium and the levels of Olsen P (a measure of plant available phosphorus), and members of Chitinophagaceae and aluminum concentrations. These relationships between specific soil attributes and individual soil taxa not only highlight ecological characteristics of these organisms but also demonstrate the ability of key bacterial taxonomic groups to reflect the impact of specific anthropogenic activities, even in comparisons of samples across large geographic areas and diverse soil types. Overall, we provide strong evidence that there is scope to use relative taxon abundances as biological indicators of soil condition. IMPORTANCE The impact of land use change and management on soil microbial community composition remains poorly understood. Therefore, we explored the relationship between a wide range of soil factors and soil bacterial community composition. We included variables related to anthropogenic activity and collected samples across a large spatial scale to interrogate the complex relationships between various bacterial community attributes and soil condition. We provide evidence of strong relationships between individual taxa and specific soil attributes even across large spatial scales and soil and land use types. Collectively, we were able to demonstrate the largely untapped potential of microorganisms to indicate the condition of soil and thereby influence the way that we monitor the effects of anthropogenic activity on soil ecosystems into the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.02826-16

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Lear G DopheideA Pierre-YvesA RobertsK WashingtonV SmithJ LewisGD. 2012. Biofilms in freshwater: their importance for the maintenance and monitoring of freshwater health, p 129–151. InMicrobial biofilms: current research and applications. Horizon Scientific Press, Norfolk, UK.
  2. 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.04.013 · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2010.04.013
  3. Curran-Cournane F . 2015. Soil quality state and trends in New Zealand's largest city after 15 years. Int J Environ Ecol Geol Geophys Eng9:227–234.
  4. Albuquerque L da CostaMS. 2014. The family Gaiellaceae, p 357–360. InRosenbergE DeLongEF LoryS StackebrandtE ThompsonF (ed), The prokaryotes. Springer, Berlin, Germany. · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30138-4_394
  5. 10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.025 · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.025
  6. 10.5897/AJMR2015.7453 · doi:10.5897/ajmr2015.7453
  7. 10.1038/256406a0 · doi:10.1038/256406a0
  8. Da Mota FF GomesEA MarrielIE PaivaE SeldinL. 2008. Bacterial and fungal communities in bulk soil and rhizospheres of aluminum-tolerant and aluminum-sensitive maize (Zea mays L.) lines cultivated in unlimed and limed cerrado soil. J Microbiol Biotechnol18:805–814.
  9. Auckland Regional Council. 2010. State of the Auckland region. Auckland Regional Council, Auckland, New Zealand.
  10. Hewitt AE . 2010. New Zealand soil classification, 3rd ed.Landcare Research Science Series No. 1. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, New Zealand.
  11. Hill RB SparlingGP. 2009. Soil quality monitoring. Land and soil monitoring: a guide for SoE and regional council reporting. Land Monitoring Forum, New Zealand.
  12. Clarke KR GorleyRN. 2015. PRIMER v7: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Hermans, S. M., Buckley, H. L., Case, B. S., Curran-Cournane, F., Taylor, M., & Lear, G.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2017-01
Volume
83
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2544682192
Cited by
288
References
36
FWCI
15.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacteria as Emerging Indicators of Soil Condition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.02826-16
The paper
Hermans, S. M., Buckley, H. L., Case, B. S., Curran-Cournane, F., Taylor, M., & Lear, G. (2017). Bacteria as Emerging Indicators of Soil Condition. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02826-16

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.