Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5,064

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea

Open access
McDonald, Daniel, Price, Morgan N, Goodrich, Julia, Nawrocki, Eric P, DeSantis, Todd Z, Probst, Alexander, Andersen, Gary L, Knight, Rob, Hugenholtz, Philip·2012·The ISME Journal

Abstract

Reference phylogenies are crucial for providing a taxonomic framework for interpretation of marker gene and metagenomic surveys, which continue to reveal novel species at a remarkable rate. Greengenes is a dedicated full-length 16S rRNA gene database that provides users with a curated taxonomy based on de novo tree inference. We developed a ‘taxonomy to tree’ approach for transferring group names from an existing taxonomy to a tree topology, and used it to apply the Greengenes, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and cyanoDB (Cyanobacteria only) taxonomies to a de novo tree comprising 408 315 sequences. We also incorporated explicit rank information provided by the NCBI taxonomy to group names (by prefixing rank designations) for better user orientation and classification consistency. The resulting merged taxonomy improved the classification of 75% of the sequences by one or more ranks relative to the original NCBI taxonomy with the most pronounced improvements occurring in under-classified environmental sequences. We also assessed candidate phyla (divisions) currently defined by NCBI and present recommendations for consolidation of 34 redundantly named groups. All intermediate results from the pipeline, which includes tree inference, jackknifing and transfer of a donor taxonomy to a recipient tree (tax2tree) are available for download. The improved Greengenes taxonomy should provide important infrastructure for a wide range of megasequencing projects studying ecosystems on scales ranging from our own bodies (the Human Microbiome Project) to the entire planet (the Earth Microbiome Project). The implementation of the software can be obtained from http://sourceforge.net/projects/tax2tree/.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ismej.2011.139

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Cannone, 2002, The comparative RNA web (CRW) site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs, BMC Bioinform, 3, 2, 10.1186/1471-2105-3-2 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Caporaso, 2010, PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment, Bioinformatics, 26, 266, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp636 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Chun, 2007, EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 57, 2259, 10.1099/ijs.0.64915-0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cole, 2009, The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis, Nucleic Acids Res, 37, D141, 10.1093/nar/gkn879 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Dalevi, 2007, Automated group assignment in large phylogenetic trees using GRUNT: GRouping, Ungrouping, Naming Tool, BMC Bioinform, 8, 402, 10.1186/1471-2105-8-402 · DOI
  6. Dojka, 1998, Microbial diversity in a hydrocarbon- and chlorinated-solvent-contaminated aquifer undergoing intrinsic bioremediation, Appl Environ Microbiol, 64, 3869, 10.1128/AEM.64.10.3869-3877.1998 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Haas, 2011, Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons, Genome Res, 21, 494, 10.1101/gr.112730.110 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hugenholtz, 1998, Novel division level bacterial diversity in a Yellowstone hot spring, J Bacteriol, 180, 366, 10.1128/JB.180.2.366-376.1998 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Kelly, 2001, Phylogenetic analysis of the succession of bacterial communities in the Great South Bay (Long Island), FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 35, 85, 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00791.x · DOI
  10. Knight, 2007, PyCogent: a toolkit for making sense from sequence, Genome Biol, 8, R171, 10.1186/gb-2007-8-8-r171 · DOI
  11. Lane, 1991, Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics
  12. Ley, 2006, Unexpected diversity and complexity of the Guerrero Negro hypersaline microbial mat, Appl Environ Microbiol, 72, 3685, 10.1128/AEM.72.5.3685-3695.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Liu, 2008, Accurate taxonomy assignments from 16S rRNA sequences produced by highly parallel pyrosequencers, Nucleic Acids Res, 36, e120, 10.1093/nar/gkn491 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Ludwig, 2001, Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology
  15. Ludwig, 2004, ARB: a software environment for sequence data, Nucleic Acids Res, 32, 1363, 10.1093/nar/gkh293 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Mavromatis, 2009, Genome analysis of the anaerobic thermohalophilic bacterium Halothermothrix orenii, PloS One, 4, e4192, 10.1371/journal.pone.0004192 · DOI
  17. Nawrocki, 2009, Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments, Bioinformatics, 25, 1335, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp157 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Peplies, 2008, A standard operating procedure for phylogenetic inference (SOPPI) using (rRNA) marker genes, Syst Appl Microbiol, 31, 251, 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.08.003 · DOI
  19. Peterson, 2009, The NIH Human Microbiome Project, Genome Res, 19, 2317, 10.1101/gr.096651.109 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Pruesse, 2007, SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB, Nucleic Acids Res, 35, 7188, 10.1093/nar/gkm864 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Sayers, 2011, Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information, Nucleic Acids Res, 39, D38, 10.1093/nar/gkq1172 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Tringe, 2008, A renaissance for the pioneering 16S rRNA gene, Curr Opin Microbiol, 11, 442, 10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Turnbaugh, 2007, The human microbiome project, Nature, 449, 804, 10.1038/nature06244 · DOI · Paper page
  24. van Rijsbergen, 1979, Information Retrieval
  25. Vogel, 2009, TerraGenome: a consortium for the sequencing of a soil metagenome, Nat Rev Micro, 7, 252, 10.1038/nrmicro2119 · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2119
  26. Wang, 2007, Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy, Appl Environ Microbiol, 73, 5261, 10.1128/AEM.00062-07 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Werner, 2011, Impact of training sets on classification of high-throughput bacterial 16s rRNA gene surveys, The ISME Journal, 6, 94, 10.1038/ismej.2011.82 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Wu, 2009, A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea, Nature, 462, 1056, 10.1038/nature08656 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 5,064

Metadata

Authors
McDonald, D., Price, M. N., Goodrich, J., Nawrocki, E. P., DeSantis, T. Z., Probst, A., Andersen, G. L., Knight, R., & Hugenholtz, P.
Venue
The ISME Journal
Published
2011-12-01
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
610-618
ISSN
  • 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7370
OpenAlex
W2154026962
Cited by
5,064
References
3
FWCI
40.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2011.139
The paper
McDonald, D., Price, M. N., Goodrich, J., Nawrocki, E. P., DeSantis, T. Z., Probst, A., Andersen, G. L., Knight, R., & Hugenholtz, P. (2012). An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.139

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.