Cited by 50Legionella and Acanthamoeba researchBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety

The Legionella pneumophila Collagen-Like Protein Mediates Sedimentation, Autoaggregation, and Pathogen-Phagocyte Interactions

Open access
Abdel-Nour, Mena, Duncan, Carla, Prashar, Akriti, Rao, Chitong, Ginevra, Christophe, Jarraud, Sophie, Low, Donald E., Ensminger, Alexander W. +2 more·2014·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Although only partially understood, multicellular behavior is relatively common in bacterial pathogens. Bacterial aggregates can resist various host defenses and colonize their environment more efficiently than planktonic cells. For the waterborne pathogen Legionella pneumophila , little is known about the roles of autoaggregation or the parameters which allow cell-cell interactions to occur. Here, we determined the endogenous and exogenous factors sufficient to allow autoaggregation to take place in L. pneumophila . We show that isolates from Legionella species which do not produce the Legionella collagen-like protein (Lcl) are deficient in autoaggregation. Targeted deletion of the Lcl-encoding gene ( lpg2644 ) and the addition of Lcl ligands impair the autoaggregation of L. pneumophila . In addition, Lcl-induced autoaggregation requires divalent cations. Escherichia coli producing surface-exposed Lcl is able to autoaggregate and shows increased biofilm production. We also demonstrate that L. pneumophila infection of Acanthamoeba castellanii and Hartmanella vermiformis is potentiated under conditions which promote Lcl dependent autoaggregation. Overall, this study shows that L. pneumophila is capable of autoaggregating in a process that is mediated by Lcl in a divalent-cation-dependent manner. It also reveals that Lcl potentiates the ability of L. pneumophila to come in contact, attach, and infect amoebae.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.03254-13

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Host internalization of L. pneumophila was eight times greater for cell aggregates compared to planktonic cells.

    “Host internalization of L. pneumophila was eight times greater for cell aggregates compared to planktonic cells.”

    From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [42]

  • Aggregation elevates invasion frequency and efficiency of host cells.

    “Aggregation has also been shown to influence pathogenesis by increasing tolerance against antimicrobial agents [3],[11],[114], elevating invasion frequency as well as invasion efficiency of host cells [42], impeding phagocytosis by cells of the host immune system [14], or increasing survival within phagosomes [13].”

    From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [42]

  • Lcl-dependent autoaggregation increased number of L. pneumophila bacteria per infected A. castellanii cell and required presence of divalent cations.

    “Also, Lcl (Legionella collagen-like protein)-dependent autoaggregation increased the number of L. pneumophila bacteria per infected A. castellanii cell and required the presence of divalent cations [42].”

    From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [42]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdel-Nour, M., Duncan, C., Prashar, A., Rao, C., Ginevra, C., Jarraud, S., Low, D. E., Ensminger, A. W., Terebiznik, M. R., & Guyard, C.
Affiliations
  • Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • CIRI—International Center for Infectiology Research, Legionella Pathogenesis Team, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2014-02-15
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
1441-1454
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2140894913
Cited by
50
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (102514_1)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Legionella and Acanthamoeba research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Keywords
Legionella pneumophila, self-aggregation, bacterial multicellularity, divalent cations, Acanthamoeba castellanii, biofilm formation, cell-cell interactions, waterborne pathogens
MeSH terms
Bacterial Adhesion, Bacterial Proteins, Cations, Divalent, Escherichia coli, Phagocytes, Lobosea, Legionella pneumophila, Gene Deletion, Acanthamoeba castellanii, Host-Pathogen Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review