Cited by 4,244Microbial Community Ecology and PhysiologyFecal contamination and water qualityMarine and coastal ecosystems

Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy

Open access
Hobbie, J E, Daley, R J, Jasper, S·1977·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Polycarbonate Nuclepore filters are better than cellulose filters for the direct counting of bacteria because they have uniform pore size and a flat surface that retains all of the bacteria on top of the filter. Although cellulose filters also retain all of the bacteria, many are trapped inside the filter where they cannot be counted. Before use, the Nuclepore filters must be dyed with irgalan black to eliminate autofluorescence. Direct counts of bacteria in lake and ocean waters are twice as high with Nuclepore filters as with cellulose filters.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.33.5.1225-1228.1977

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hobbie, J. E., Daley, R. J., & Jasper, S.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
1977-05
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
1225-1228
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W1515985097
Cited by
4,244
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 74
FWCI
38.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
Nuclepore filters, polycarbonate filters, cellulose filters, bacterial enumeration, fluorescence microscopy, autofluorescence, filter pore size, lake water, ocean water
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Bacteriological Techniques, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Fresh Water, Micropore Filters, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Seawater, Water Microbiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review