Cited by 161Arsenic contamination and mitigationMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

Bacterial dissimilatory reduction of arsenate and sulfate in meromictic Mono Lake, California

Open access
Oremland, Ronald S, Dowdle, Philip R, Hoeft, Shelly, Sharp, Jonathan O, Schaefer, Jeffra K, Miller, Laurence G, Switzer Blum, Jodi, Smith, Richard L +2 more·2000·Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0016-7037(00)00422-1

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As(V) can be the dominant electron acceptor for carbon oxidation in some environments such as Mono lake, California.

    “In addition, As(V) can be the dominant electron acceptor for carbon oxidation in some environments such as Mono lake, California [95].”

    From Microbial reduction of metals and radionuclides (2003) · cites this paper as [95]

    The Discussion (page not provided) suggests that As(V) could become a more important electron acceptor for carbon mineralization in arsenic-rich soda lakes saltier than Mono Lake. But its calculations for Mono Lake attribute 8.2–14.1% of annual pelagic carbon mineralization to As(V) respiration, versus 23.8–41.2% to sulfate reduction. Mono Lake therefore does not support the claim's example of As(V) being dominant. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oremland, R. S., Dowdle, P. R., Hoeft, S., Sharp, J. O., Schaefer, J. K., Miller, L. G., Switzer Blum, J., Smith, R. L., Bloom, N. S., & Wallschlaeger, D.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Oremland, Ronald S
Venue
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
64
Issue
18
Pages
3073-3084
ISSN
0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031651844
Cited by
161
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
arsenate reduction, sulfate reduction, meromictic lakes, Mono Lake, arsenic speciation, arsenite, anaerobic respiration, electron acceptors, carbon mineralization, primary production, salt saturation, arsenic biogeochemistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review