The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diurnal variations in bacterial numbers and fluid parameters in ruminal contents of animals fed low- or high-forage diets
Open accessAbstract
Differential carbohydrate media and anaerobic replica plating techniques were used to assess the degrees of diurnal variations in the direct and viable cell counts as well as the carbohydrate-specific subgroups within the mixed rumen bacterial populations in cattle fed maintenance (metabolizable energy) levels of either a high-forage or a high-concentrate diet once daily. The rumen was sampled at 1 h before feeding and 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 h after feeding, and selected microbiological parameters of the isolated bacterial populations were assessed. Corresponding samples of ruminal fluid were assayed for fermentation acids, carbohydrate, ammonia, and pH changes. The data showed that regardless of diet, total bacterial numbers remained fairly constant throughout the day. The number of viable bacteria declined 40 to 60% after feeding and then increased to a maximum at 16 h postfeeding. Changes occurred in the carbohydrate-specific subgroups within the bacterial populations, and some of the changes were consistent with a predicted scheme of ruminal feedstuff carbohydrate fermentation. Regardless of diet, however, soluble-carbohydrate-utilizing bacteria predominated at all times. Xylan-xylose and pectin subgroups respectively comprised about one-half and one-third of the population when the high-forage diet was given. These subgroups, along with the cellulolytics, constituted lesser proportions of the population when the high-concentrate diet was given. The cellulolytic subgroup was the least numerous of all subgroups regardless of diet but followed a diurnal pattern similar to that predicted for cellulose fermentation. There were few diurnal variations or differences in bacterial cell compositions and ruminal fluid parameters between diets. The observed similarities and dissimilarities of the rumen bacterial populations obtained when the two diets were given are discussed. The data are consistent with the versatility and constancy of the rumen as a stable, mature microbial system under the specific low-level feeding regimens used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ruminal Acidosis in Beef Cattle: The Current Microbiological and Nutritional Outlook
Nagaraja, T. G., & Titgemeyer, E. C. (2007) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2006-478 · Cited by 873
Janssen, P. H. (2010) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.07.002 · Cited by 836
Stewart, C. S., Flint, H. J., & Bryant, M. P. (1997) · The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_2 · Cited by 772
Self-citationDenman, S. E., & McSweeney, C. S. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00190.x · Cited by 754
Starch Hydrolysis by the Ruminal Microflora ,
Kotarski, S. F., KWaniska, R. D., & Thurn, K. K. (1992) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/122.1.178 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Leedle, J. A., Bryant, M. P., & Hespell, R. B.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1982-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 402-412
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2133544596
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diurnal variations in bacterial numbers and fluid parameters in ruminal contents of animals fed low- or high-forage diets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.44.2.402-412.1982
- The paper
- Leedle, J. A., Bryant, M. P., & Hespell, R. B. (1982). Diurnal variations in bacterial numbers and fluid parameters in ruminal contents of animals fed low- or high-forage diets. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.44.2.402-412.1982
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.