Cited by 776Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionGut microbiota and health

The rumen bacteria

Stewart, C. S., Flint, H. J., Bryant, M. P.·1997·The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_2

Cites

414 of 414 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stewart, C. S., Flint, H. J., & Bryant, M. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem
Published
1997
Pages
10-72
OpenAlex
W1519909963
Cited by
772
References
405
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 31
FWCI
26.93
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
rumen bacteria, rumen microbiology, anaerobic cultivation, culturomics, direct microscopic count, Syntrophomonas wolfei, anaerobic digestion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review