The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adaptation of Natural Microbial Communities to Degradation of Xenobiotic Compounds: Effects of Concentration, Exposure Time, Inoculum, and Chemical Structure
Open accessAbstract
Adaptation of microbial communities to faster degradation of xenobiotic compounds after exposure to the compound was studied in ecocores. Radiolabeled test compounds were added to cores that contained natural water and sediment. Adaptation was detected by comparing mineralization rates or disappearance of a parent compound in preexposed and unexposed cores. Microbial communities in preexposed cores from a number of freshwater sampling sites adapted to degrade p -nitrophenol faster; communities from estuarine or marine sites did not show any increase in rates of degradation as a result of preexposure. Adaptation was maximal after 2 weeks and was not detectable after 6 weeks. A threshold concentration of 10 ppb (10 ng/ml) was observed; below this concentration no adaptation was detected. With concentrations of 20 to 100 ppb (20 to 100 ng/ml), the biodegradation rates in preexposed cores were much higher than the rates in control cores and were proportional to the concentration of the test compound. In addition, trifluralin, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, and p -cresol were tested to determine whether preexposure affected subsequent biodegradation. Microbial communities did not adapt to trifluralin. Adaptation to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid was similar to adaptation to nitrophenol. p -Cresol was mineralized rapidly in both preexposed and unexposed communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review
Chen, Y., Cheng, J. J., & Creamer, K. S. (2008) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057 · Cited by 4,830
Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment
Leahy, J. G., & Colwell, R. R. (1990) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.54.3.305-315.1990 · Cited by 2,572
Molecular mechanisms of genetic adaptation to xenobiotic compounds
van der Meer, J. R., de Vos, W. M., Harayama, S., & Zehnder, A. J. B. (1992) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.56.4.677-694.1992 · Cited by 640
Semple, K. T., Morriss, A. W. J., & Paton, G. I. (2003) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1046/j.1351-0754.2003.0564.x · Cited by 614
Soil microbial biomass—what do the numbers really mean?
Dalal, R. C. (1998) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea97142 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Spain, J. C., & Van Veld, P. A.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1983-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 428-435
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1898370941
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptation of Natural Microbial Communities to Degradation of Xenobiotic Compounds: Effects of Concentration, Exposure Time, Inoculum, and Chemical Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.45.2.428-435.1983
- The paper
- Spain, J. C., & Van Veld, P. A. (1983). Adaptation of Natural Microbial Communities to Degradation of Xenobiotic Compounds: Effects of Concentration, Exposure Time, Inoculum, and Chemical Structure. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.45.2.428-435.1983
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.