Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reasons for possible failure of inoculation to enhance biodegradation

Open access
Goldstein, R M, Mallory, L M, Alexander, M·1985·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Pseudomonas strains capable of mineralizing 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP) and p-nitrophenol (PNP) in culture media were isolated from soil. One DCP-metabolizing strain mineralized 1.0 and 10 micrograms of DCP but not 2.0 to 300 ng/ml in culture. When added to lake water containing 10 micrograms of DCP per ml, the bacterium did not mineralize the compound, and only after 6 days did it cause the degradation of 1.0 microgram of DCP per ml. The organism did not grow or metabolize DCP when inoculated into sterile lake water, but it multiplied in sterile lake water amended with glucose or with DCP and supplemental nutrients. Its population density declined and DCP was not mineralized when the pseudomonad was added to nonsterile sewage, but the bacterium grew in sterile DCP-amended sewage, although not causing appreciable mineralization of the test compound. Addition of the bacterium to nonsterile soil did not result in the mineralization of 10 micrograms of DCP per g, although mineralization was evident if the inoculum was added to sterile soil. A second DCP-utilizing pseudomonad failed to mineralize DCP when added to the surface of sterile soil, although activity was evident if the inoculum was mixed with the soil. A pseudomonad able to mineralize 5.0 micrograms of PNP per ml in culture did not mineralize the compound in sterile or nonsterile lake water. The bacterium destroyed PNP in sterile sewage and enhanced PNP mineralization in nonsterile sewage. When added to the surface of sterile soil, the bacterium mineralized little of the PNP present at 5.0 micrograms/g, but it was active if mixed well with the sterile soil.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.50.4.977-983.1985

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Goldstein, R. M., Mallory, L. M., & Alexander, M.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
1985-10
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
977-983
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W1909050382
Cited by
349
References
4
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reasons for possible failure of inoculation to enhance biodegradation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.50.4.977-983.1985
The paper
Goldstein, R. M., Mallory, L. M., & Alexander, M. (1985). Reasons for possible failure of inoculation to enhance biodegradation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.50.4.977-983.1985

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.